Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22790420›Full record

ReviewReports on progress in physics. Physical Society (Great Britain)2012

Engineering metallic nanostructures for plasmonics and nanophotonics.

Nathan C Lindquist, Prashant Nagpal, Kevin M McPeak, David J Norris, Sang-Hyun Oh

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Reports on progress in physics. Physical Society (Great Britain), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed
29.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 485 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Porous spherical gold nanoparticlesNanoscale advances · 2022
    Article
  10. Madelung Formalism for Electron Spill-Out in Nonlocal Nanoplasmonics.The journal of physical chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and interfaces · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Nanomedicine, a valuable tool for skeletal muscle disorders: Challenges, promises, and limitations.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology · 2022
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Nathan C LindquistDepartment of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Prashant Nagpal
Kevin M McPeak
David J Norris
Sang-Hyun Oh
ETH Zurich · CHBethel University · USLos Alamos National Laboratory · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

Nanopore Biosensor for Kinetics of Reparative Antibodies on Plasma MembranesR01GM092993 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI OH, SANG-HYUN · 2010 to 2013
$1.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM092993
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Metallic nanostructures now play an important role in many applications. In particular, for the emerging fields of plasmonics and nanophotonics, the ability to engineer metals on nanometric scales allows the development of new devices and the study of exciting physics. This review focuses on top-down nanofabrication techniques for engineering metallic nanostructures, along with computational and experimental characterization techniques. A variety of current and emerging applications are also covered.

Indexed as

Metal NanoparticlesBiosensing TechniquesEngineeringNanotechnologyOptical PhenomenaQuantum DotsSpectrum Analysis, RamanSurface Plasmon Resonance

Identifiers

PMID22790420
PMCPMC3396886
OpenAlexW2159109989

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.