ArticleBlood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue2012
Refusal of blood transfusion by Jehovah's Witness women: a survey of current management in obstetric and gynaecological practice in the U.K.
Article in Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Utilizing acute normovolemic hemodilution for blood conservation in myomectomy for Jehovah's Witnesses: A case report.SAGE open medical case reports · 2024Article
- Between Autonomy and Paternalism: Attitudes of Nursing Personnel Towards Jehovah's Witnesses' Refusal of Blood Transfusion.International journal of public health · 2023Article
- Treating symptomatic uterine fibroids with myomectomy: current practice and views of UK consultants.Gynecological surgery · 2017Article
- Refusal of Medical Blood Transfusions Among Jehovah's Witnesses: Emotion Regulation of the Dissonance of Saving and Sacrificing Life.Journal of religion and health · 2016Article
- Jehovah's Witnesses and blood transfusion refusal: what next?Blood transfusion = Trasfusione del sangue · 2014Article
- Improving validity of informed consent for biomedical research in Zambia using a laboratory exposure intervention.PloS one · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRefusal of blood transfusion by Jehovah's Witness (JW) women poses potential problems for obstetrics worldwide as haemorrhage remains a major cause of maternal morbidity and mortality. There is a general consensus that morbidity and mortality rates in association with childbirth and gynaecological interventions are higher in these women than in the general population. We conducted a postal questionnaire survey of current practice among U.K. consultant obstetricians and gynaecologists to establish the practices that could contribute to poor outcomes in these women. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe main variables of interest were: use of a multi-disciplinary approach; the acceptable minimum haemoglobin (Hb) concentration before vaginal delivery and abdominal hysterectomy as low to medium risk scenarios and open myomectomy as a high risk scenario for haemorrhage; Hb concentration thresholds for iron supplementation; and the use of oral iron, intravenous iron, erythropoietin and cell salvage as potential management tools.
resultsThe response rate was 28%. Sixty percent of gynaecologists and 85% of obstetricians reported having a protocol for the management of JW women. Forty-six percent of consultants adopt a multi-disciplinary approach which include anaesthetists and haematologists. A Hb concentration of >11-12 g/dL is considered the minimum acceptable level by a majority (47%) prior to normal delivery and by 42% of gynaecologists prior to abdominal hysterectomy. For open myomectomy 28% of gynaecologists prefer a minimum level of 11-12 g/dL but a further 31% of gynaecologists prefer a minimum level of 12-13 g/dL. DISCUSSION: A small but substantial proportion of consultants do not have protocols, operate on JW women with low Hb concentrations, do not use a lower Hb concentration threshold for supplementation, and do not adopt a multi-disciplinary approach, all of which could contribute to the reported poor outcomes in these women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.