Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22790249›Full record

Trial reportAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2013

Comparison of stent-retriever devices versus the Merci retriever for endovascular treatment of acute stroke.

E Broussalis, E Trinka, W Hitzl, A Wallner, V Chroust, M Killer-Oberpfalzer

Open access · hybridAbstract readClinical TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. The effect of distal aspiration catheter position on collateral flow in mechanical thrombectomy - anInterventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. The initial experience with the Embotrap III stent-retriever in a real world setting.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Stream Device-A Retrospective Review of 51 Cases.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023
    Article
  11. Stentrievers : An engineering review.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2023
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Meta-Analysis of Endovascular Treatment for Acute M2 Occlusion.Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

E BroussalisDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria. e.broussalis@salk.at
E Trinka
W Hitzl
A Wallner
V Chroust
M Killer-Oberpfalzer
University of Salzburg · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeRevascularization of large cerebral artery occlusion is the therapeutic goal in stroke therapy. Currently, many recanalization devices are in clinical use. This study compares the outcome parameters, efficacy, and safety of the new generation of stent-retriever devices with the well-established Merci retriever. MATERIALS AND

methodsAll patients who received endovascular mechanical recanalization therapy were prospectively registered. One hundred twenty-two patients were treated with either new stent retrievers, including the Trevo and Solitaire devices, or the Merci retriever system. Recanalization of the occluded vessel was assessed in accordance with the modified TICI score, and outcome parameters, including the NIHSS and mRS scores, were documented. Clinical status was recorded after neurointervention, at time of discharge, and after 90 days.

resultsThe mean age of all patients was 68 years; 54% were male, with no statistical differences in demographics between both groups. Successful recanalization (TICI 3 and TICI 2b) was achieved in 82% of patients treated with stent retrievers compared with 62% of patients treated with Merci retrievers (P = .016). In the 90-day follow-up, 65% of patients treated with stent retrievers and 35% of those treated with the Merci had achieved a good (mRS = 0-2) clinical outcome (P = .002). Patients treated with stent retrievers had a significantly shorter treatment time (72 versus 122 minutes, P < .01) and less severe intracerebral hemorrhages (10% versus 28%, P < .01).

conclusionsPatients treated with Trevo and Solitaire stents had a better revascularization rate, better clinical outcome, and lower complication rate than patients treated with the Merci retriever.

Indexed as

StentsAcute DiseaseAgedBrain IschemiaCerebral AngiographyCerebral HemorrhageCerebral RevascularizationDevice RemovalFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInfarction, Middle Cerebral ArteryMalePostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesThrombectomy

Identifiers

PMID22790249
PMCPMC7965100
OpenAlexW2169146385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.