Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22789987›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in HIV and AIDS2012

Pharmacology of HIV integrase inhibitors.

Jessica L Adams, Benjamin N Greener, Angela D M Kashuba

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in HIV and AIDS, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Renal effects of novel antiretroviral drugs.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2017
    Review
  10. Integrase inhibitors in late pregnancy and rapid HIV viral load reduction.American journal of obstetrics and gynecology · 2016
    Article
  11. Drug delivery strategies and systems for HIV/AIDS pre-exposure prophylaxis and treatment.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2015
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jessica L AdamsDivision of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics, Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Benjamin N Greener
Angela D M Kashuba

Funding

Virology, Immunology, and Microbiology CoreP30AI050410 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI DAVID M. MARGOLIS · 2001 to 2026
$76.9M
Preventing HIV Infection in Women: Targeting Antiretrovirals to Mucosal TissuesU01AI095031 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI KASHUBA, ANGELA D · 2011 to 2013
$2.4M
NIAID NIH HHS 5P30AI050410-13NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI050410NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI095031NIAID NIH HHS U01AI095031-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThe purpose of this study is to review recent and relevant pharmacology data for three HIV integrase inhibitors: raltegravir (marketed), dolutegravir, and elvitegravir (both in phase III drug development). RECENT

findingsData from January 2011 to April 2012 were evaluated. These data better characterized integrase inhibitor pharmacokinetics, assessed dosing regimens, and investigated previously undescribed drug-drug interactions. Due to formulation challenges, raltegravir inter-patient and intra-patient pharmacokinetic variability is high. Twice-daily 400  mg dosing has been shown to be clinically superior to 800  mg once-daily dosing. A pediatric formulation of raltegravir with less variable pharmacokinetics and greater bioavailability was US Food and Drug Administration (US FDA)-approved in December 2011. Cobicistat-boosted elvitegravir, and the second-generation integrase inhibitor dolutegravir, have lower pharmacokinetic variability and are dosed once daily. Dolutegravir drug interactions are similar to raltegravir, whereas boosted elvitegravir participates in additional CYP3A-mediated interactions. SUMMARY: Raltegravir's potent antiretroviral activity has resulted in widespread use in both treatment-naïve and experienced patients. Dolutegravir and cobicistat-boosted elvitegravir have some pharmacokinetic advantages. Pharmacokinetic data in special populations (pregnancy, pediatrics) to optimize dosing are still required.

Indexed as

DolutegravirHeterocyclic Compounds, 3-RingHIV-1HIV InfectionsHIV Integrase InhibitorsHumansOxazinesPiperazinesPyridonesPyrrolidinonesQuinolonesRaltegravir PotassiumUnited StatesDolutegravirelvitegravirHeterocyclic Compounds, 3-RingHIV Integrase InhibitorsOxazinesPiperazinesPyridonesPyrrolidinonesQuinolonesRaltegravir Potassium

Identifiers

PMID22789987
PMCPMC3657291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.