Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22788801›Full record

ArticleBMC gastroenterology2012

Systemic administration of a novel human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells population accelerates the resolution of acute liver injury.

Patrizia Burra, Diletta Arcidiacono, Debora Bizzaro, Tatiana Chioato, Rosa Di Liddo, Antara Banerjee, Andrea Cappon, Patrizio Bo, Maria Teresa Conconi, Pier Paolo Parnigotto and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC gastroenterology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Journal of stem cells & regenerative medicine · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. TGFβJournal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Patrizia BurraGastroenterology, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, Padova University Hospital, Via Giustiniani 2, Padova, 35128, Italy. burra@unipd.it
Diletta Arcidiacono
Debora Bizzaro
Tatiana Chioato
Rosa Di Liddo
Antara Banerjee
Andrea Cappon
Patrizio Bo
Maria Teresa Conconi
Pier Paolo Parnigotto
Silvia Mirandola
Enrico Gringeri
Amedeo Carraro
Umberto Cillo
Francesco Paolo Russo
University of Padua · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHepatocytes and stem cells transplantation may be an alternative to liver transplantation in acute or chronic liver disease. We aimed to evaluate the therapeutic potential of mesenchymal stem cells from human umbilical cord (UCMSCs), a readily available source of mesenchymal stem cells, in the CCl4-induced acute liver injury model.

methodsMesenchymal stem cells profile was analyzed by flow cytometry. In order to evaluate the capability of our UCMSCs to differentiate in hepatocytes, cells were seeded on three different supports, untreated plastic support, MatrigelTM and human liver acellular matrix. Cells were analyzed by immunocitochemistry for alpha-fetoprotein and albumin expression, qPCR for hepatocyte markers gene expression, Periodic Acid-Schiff staining for glycogen storage, ELISA for albumin detection and colorimetric assay for urea secretion.To assess the effects of undifferentiated UCMSCs in hepatic regeneration after an acute liver injury, we transplanted them via tail vein in mice injected intraperitoneally with a single dose of CCl4. Livers were analyzed by histological evaluation for damage quantification, immunostaining for Kupffer and stellate cells/liver myofibroblasts activation and for UCMSCs homing. Pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines gene expression was evaluated by qPCR analysis and antioxidant enzyme activity was measured by catalase quantification.Data were analyzed by Mann-Whitney U-test, Kruskal-Wallis test and Cuzick's test followed by Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons.

resultsWe have standardized the isolation procedure to obtain a cell population with hepatogenic properties prior to in vivo transplantation. When subjected to hepatogenic differentiation on untreated plastic support, UCMSCs differentiated in hepatocyte-like cells as demonstrated by their morphology, progressive up-regulation of mature hepatocyte markers, glycogen storage, albumin and urea secretion. However, cells seeded on 3D-supports showed a minor or negligible differentiation capacity.UCMSCs-transplanted mice showed a more rapid damage resolution, as shown by histological analysis, with a lower inflammation level and an increased catalase activity compared to CCl4-treated mice.

conclusionsOur findings show that UCMSCs can be reliably isolated, have hepatogenic properties and following systemic administration are able to accelerate the resolution of an acute liver injury without any differentiation and manipulation. These features make UCMSCs strong candidates for future application in regenerative medicine for human acute liver disease.

Indexed as

Cord Blood Stem Cell TransplantationMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationAcute Lung InjuryAlbuminsalpha-FetoproteinsAnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsBiomarkersCarbon TetrachlorideCatalaseCell DifferentiationCells, CulturedCell SeparationCytokinesGlycogenHumansAlbuminsalpha-FetoproteinsBiocompatible MaterialsBiomarkersCarbon TetrachlorideCatalaseCytokinesGlycogenUrea

Identifiers

PMID22788801
PMCPMC3458924
OpenAlexW2019303062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.