Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22788116›Full record

ArticleNeurogastroenterology and motility2012

Multiple rapid swallow responses segregate achalasia subtypes on high-resolution manometry.

V Kushnir, G S Sayuk, C P Gyawali

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurogastroenterology and motility, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Achalasia.Nature reviews. Disease primers · 2022
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Chicago classification version 4.0Neurogastroenterology and motility · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Achalasia: It Is Not All Black and White.Current gastroenterology reports · 2017
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Identification of Quality Measures for Performance of and Interpretation of Data From Esophageal Manometry.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2016
    Article
  16. Observational
  17. Histopathologic patterns among achalasia subtypes.Neurogastroenterology and motility · 2016
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

V KushnirDivision of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
G S Sayuk
C P Gyawali

Funding

Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational SciencesUL1TR000448 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EVANOFF, BRADLEY A · 2012 to 2016
$41.4M
CLINICAL/LABORATORY TRAINING ACADEMIC GASTROENTEROLOGYT32DK007130 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI MATTHEW AARON CIORBA · 1986 to 2026
$8.3M
RENAL FUNCTION AND DISEASET32DK007301 · NIDDK · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI STANTON, BRUCE A. · 1986 to 2014
$2.3M
Pilot Prospective Study of Minor Papilla Endoscopic Sphincterotomy for Pancreas DR21DK084413 · NIDDK · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI ROMAGNUOLO, JOSEPH · 2010 to 2011
$443k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000448NIDDK NIH HHS 5-T32-DK07301-35NIDDK NIH HHS K23DK84413-2NIDDK NIH HHS R21 DK084413NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007130NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK007301
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMultiple rapid swallows (MRS) inhibit esophageal peristalsis and lower esophageal sphincter (LES) tone; a rebound excitatory response then results in an exaggerated peristaltic sequence. Multiple rapid swallows responses are dependent on intact inhibitory and excitatory neural function and could vary by subtype in achalasia spectrum disorders.

methodsConsecutive subjects with incomplete LES relaxation on high-resolution manometry (HRM) (Sierra Scientific, Los Angeles, CA, USA) in the absence of mechanical obstruction were prospectively identified. Achalasia spectrum disorders were classified and HRM plots reviewed according to Chicago criteria. Esophageal peristaltic performance and LES function were assessed after 10 wet swallows and MRS (five 2 mL water swallows 2-3 s apart). Findings were compared with 18 healthy controls (28.5 ± 0.6 years, 44% women). KEY

resultsA total of 46 subjects (57.1 ± 2.1 years, 52.2% women) met inclusion criteria. There was complete failure of peristalsis with MRS in all subjects with achalasia subtypes 1 and 2. In contrast, 80% of achalasia subtype 3 and incomplete LES relaxation (EGJ outflow obstruction) with preserved esophageal body peristalsis had a contractile response to MRS (P < 0.001 compared with subtypes 1 and 2); controls demonstrated 94.4% peristalsis. Percent decrease in LES residual pressure during MRS (compared to wet swallows) segregated achalasia subtypes; those with aperistalsis (subtypes 1 and 2) had a lesser decline (22.6%) compared to those with retained esophageal body peristalsis (40.5%) and controls (51.3%, P < 0.001 across groups). CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: Multiple rapid swallow responses segregate achalasia spectrum disorders into two patterns differentiated by presence or absence of esophageal body contraction response to wet swallows. These findings support subtyping of achalasia, with pathophysiologic implications.

Indexed as

AdultDeglutitionEsophageal AchalasiaFemaleHumansMaleManometryMiddle AgedProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID22788116
PMCPMC3508286

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.