ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2012
New model of retinocollicular mapping predicts the mechanisms of axonal competition and explains the role of reverse molecular signaling during development.
Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- New insights on the modeling of the molecular mechanisms underlying neural maps alignment in the midbrain.eLife · 2020Article
- Theoretical Models of Neural Development.iScience · 2018Review
- Visual Maps Development: Reconsidering the Role of Retinal Efnas and Basic Principle of Map Alignment.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2018Article
- Revisiting chemoaffinity theory: Chemotactic implementation of topographic axonal projection.PLoS computational biology · 2017Article
- Novel Models of Visual Topographic Map Alignment in the Superior Colliculus.PLoS computational biology · 2016Article
- Stochastic Interaction between Neural Activity and Molecular Cues in the Formation of Topographic Maps.Neuron · 2015Article
- Quantitative assessment of computational models for retinotopic map formation.Developmental neurobiology · 2015Article
- Dendritic and axonal targeting patterns of a genetically-specified class of retinal ganglion cells that participate in image-forming circuits.Neural development · 2014Article
- Different roles of axon guidance cues and patterned spontaneous activity in establishing receptive fields in the mouse superior colliculus.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2014Article
- Review
- Retinocollicular mapping explained?Visual neuroscience · 2013Article
- On the Importance of Countergradients for the Development of Retinotopy: Insights from a Generalised Gierer Model.PloS one · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Precise connections in the brain result from elaborate processes during development. In the visual system, axonal projections from retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) onto the superior colliculus form a precise retinotopic map. Studies have revealed that the development of retinocollicular maps involves three main factors: graded expression of molecular guidance cues such as EphAs and ephrin-As, activity-dependent processes driven by spontaneous activity in RGCs, and different forms of axonal competition. In this study, we developed a new, versatile model including these factors. We first modeled the selective arborization of RGC axons, mediated by EphA/ephrin-A signaling, without assuming that this initial process instructed the map's final topology. We also derived an integro-differential equation modeling a second, dynamic phase in which activity-dependent plasticity of axonal arbors combined with their competition for collicular resources can deeply remodel the topology of immature maps. Our model hence challenges the view that retinotopic maps are instructed by matching molecular gradients and then merely refined by activity-dependent processes. We reproduce fine features of retinotopic map development in wild-type and various transgenic mice, allowing a new understanding of the underlying mechanisms. Our model predicts that competition is not based on comparisons of axonal EphA receptor levels but rather relies on the optimization of collicular resources mediated by neurotrophic receptors such as p75(NTR). Our model finally clarifies the elusive role of reverse signaling between retinal ephrin-As and collicular EphAs by reproducing for the first time the phenotypes of two mouse genotypes in which this function is altered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.