Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22786953›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2012

Neural time course of visually enhanced echo suppression.

Christopher W Bishop, Sam London, Lee M Miller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. The precedence effect in sound localization.Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology : JARO · 2015
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Christopher W BishopCenter for Mind and Brain, University of California, Davis, California 95618, USA. cwbishop@ucdavis.edu
Sam London
Lee M Miller

Funding

NEURAL NETWORKS FOR SPEECH PERCEPTION IN NOISER01DC008171 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI MILLER, LEE M · 2006 to 2010
$1.7M
Neural mechanisms of audiovisual spatial interactionsF31DC011429 · NIDCD · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI BISHOP, CHRISTOPHER WAYNE · 2010 to 2011
$71k
NIDCD NIH HHS 3R01-DC-008171-04S1NIDCD NIH HHS F31-DC-011429NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC008171NIDCD NIH HHS R01-DC-008171
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Auditory spatial perception plays a critical role in day-to-day communication. For instance, listeners utilize acoustic spatial information to segregate individual talkers into distinct auditory "streams" to improve speech intelligibility. However, spatial localization is an exceedingly difficult task in everyday listening environments with numerous distracting echoes from nearby surfaces, such as walls. Listeners' brains overcome this unique challenge by relying on acoustic timing and, quite surprisingly, visual spatial information to suppress short-latency (1-10 ms) echoes through a process known as "the precedence effect" or "echo suppression." In the present study, we employed electroencephalography (EEG) to investigate the neural time course of echo suppression both with and without the aid of coincident visual stimulation in human listeners. We find that echo suppression is a multistage process initialized during the auditory N1 (70-100 ms) and followed by space-specific suppression mechanisms from 150 to 250 ms. Additionally, we find a robust correlate of listeners' spatial perception (i.e., suppressing or not suppressing the echo) over central electrode sites from 300 to 500 ms. Contrary to our hypothesis, vision's powerful contribution to echo suppression occurs late in processing (250-400 ms), suggesting that vision contributes primarily during late sensory or decision making processes. Together, our findings support growing evidence that echo suppression is a slow, progressive mechanism modifiable by visual influences during late sensory and decision making stages. Furthermore, our findings suggest that audiovisual interactions are not limited to early, sensory-level modulations but extend well into late stages of cortical processing.

Indexed as

Photic StimulationAcoustic StimulationAdultAuditory PerceptionDiscrimination, PsychologicalEvoked Potentials, AuditoryFemaleHumansMaleModels, NeurologicalSpace PerceptionVisual Perception

Identifiers

PMID22786953
PMCPMC3545000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.