Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22786885›Full record

ReviewCytoskeleton (Hoboken, N.J.)2012

Growth, interaction, and positioning of microtubule asters in extremely large vertebrate embryo cells.

Timothy Mitchison, Martin Wühr, Phuong Nguyen, Keisuke Ishihara, Aaron Groen, Christine M Field

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cytoskeleton (Hoboken, N.J.), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed, 102 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Aurora kinases: Generators of spatial control during mitosis.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Spring-like behavior of cytoplasm holds the mitotic spindle in place.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Contribution of cytoplasm viscoelastic properties to mitotic spindle positioning.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  11. Self-Organization of Cellular Units.Annual review of cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Scaling of Subcellular Structures.Annual review of cell and developmental biology · 2020
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Timothy MitchisonDepartment of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School and Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Massachusetts, USA.
Martin Wühr
Phuong Nguyen
Keisuke Ishihara
Aaron Groen
Christine M Field
Harvard University · USMarine Biological Laboratory · US

Funding

MICROTUBULE DYNAMICS AND MITOTIC MECHANISMR01GM039565 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO · PI MITCHISON, TIMOTHY J · 1988 to 2018
$6.2M
MICROTUBULE DYNAMICS AND MITOTIC MECHANISMR37GM039565 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO · PI MITCHISON, TIMOTHY J · 1997 to 2006
$3.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM39565NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM039565NIGMS NIH HHS R37 GM039565
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ray Rappaport spent many years studying microtubule asters, and how they induce cleavage furrows. Here, we review recent progress on aster structure and dynamics in zygotes and early blastomeres of Xenopus laevis and Zebrafish, where cells are extremely large. Mitotic and interphase asters differ markedly in size, and only interphase asters span the cell. Growth of interphase asters occurs by a mechanism that allows microtubule density at the aster periphery to remain approximately constant as radius increases. We discuss models for aster growth, and favor a branching nucleation process. Neighboring asters that grow into each other interact to block further growth at the shared boundary. We compare the morphology of interaction zones formed between pairs of asters that grow out from the poles of the same mitotic spindle (sister asters) and between pairs not related by mitosis (non-sister asters) that meet following polyspermic fertilization. We argue growing asters recognize each other by interaction between antiparallel microtubules at the mutual boundary, and discuss models for molecular organization of interaction zones. Finally, we discuss models for how asters, and the centrosomes within them, are positioned by dynein-mediated pulling forces so as to generate stereotyped cleavage patterns. Studying these problems in extremely large cells is starting to reveal how general principles of cell organization scale with cell size.

Indexed as

Cell SizeAnimalsCentrosomeEmbryo, NonmammalianInterphaseMicrotubulesVertebrates

Identifiers

PMID22786885
PMCPMC3690567
OpenAlexW2048141009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.