Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22786524›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2012

Non-opioid drugs for pain management in labour.

Mohammad Othman, Leanne Jones, James P Neilson

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02232035 (Intravenous Injection of Diazepam at the Beginning of Active Phase of Labor), which is not on this map. Cited by 22 papers, 15 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 15 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02232035 phase2unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2014, after this paper: background citation

Intravenous Injection of Diazepam at the Beginning of Active Phase of Labor

TypeinterventionalSponsorNavy General Hospital, BeijingRan2014 to 2015Enrolled400ConditionsPain, Prolonged LabourArmsnormal saline/diazepam at the active phase of labor
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 15 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Acupuncture or acupressure for pain management during labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Parenteral opioids for maternal pain management in labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia for pain management in labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  4. Immersion in water during labour and birth.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  5. Relaxation techniques for pain management in labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  6. Massage, reflexology and other manual methods for pain management in labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  7. Hypnosis for pain management during labour and childbirth.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  8. Inhaled analgesia for pain management in labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  9. Local anaesthetic nerve block for pain management in labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  10. Pain management for women in labour: an overview of systematic reviews.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2012
    Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Aromatherapy for pain management in labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2011
    Pooled it
  13. Parenteral opioids for maternal pain relief in labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2010
    Pooled it
  14. Pooled it
  15. Immersion in water in labour and birth.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2009
    Pooled it
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. [Pain therapy in obstetrics].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mohammad OthmanCochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group, Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK. mothman12399@yahoo.com.
Leanne Jones
James P Neilson
Liverpool Womens NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

Department of Health 10/4000/02Department of Health SRP/10/4000/02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLabour is a normal physiological process, but is usually associated with pain and discomfort. Numerous methods are used to relieve labour pain. These include pharmacological (e.g. epidural, opioids, inhaled analgesia) and non-pharmacological (e.g. hypnosis, acupuncture) methods of pain management. Non-opioid drugs are a pharmacological method used to control mild to moderate pain.

objectivesTo summarise the evidence regarding the effects and safety of the use of non-opioid drugs to relieve pain in labour. SEARCH

methodsWe searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (15 February 2012). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) using non-opioid drugs (non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs); paracetamol; antispasmodics; sedatives and antihistamines) in comparison with placebo or standard care; different forms of non-opioid drugs (e.g. sedatives versus antihistamines); or different interventions (e.g. non-opioids versus opioids) for women in labour. Quasi-RCTs and trials using a cross-over design were not included. Cluster-randomised RCTs were eligible for inclusion but none were identified for inclusion. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed for inclusion all studies identified by the search strategy, carried out data extraction and assessed risk of bias. We resolved any disagreement through discussion with a third author. Data were checked for accuracy. MAIN

resultsNineteen studies randomising a total of 2863 women were included in this review. There were three main comparison groups: 15 studies compared non-opioid drugs with placebo or no treatment (2133 women); three studies compared non-opioid drugs with opioids (563 women); and three studies compared one type of non-opioid drug with a different type or dose of non-opioid drug (590 women). Some of the studies included three or more groups and so have been put in more than one comparison. Overall, there was little difference between groups for most of the comparisons. Any differences observed for outcomes were mainly limited to one or two studies. Non-opioid drugs (sedatives) were found to offer better pain relief (mean difference (MD) -22.00; 95% confidence interval (CI) -35.86 to -8.14, one trial, 50 women), better satisfaction with pain relief (sedatives and antihistamines) (risk ratio (RR) 1.59; 95% CI 1.15 to 2.21, two trials, 204 women; RR 1.80; 95% CI 1.16 to 2.79, one trial, 223 women) and better satisfaction with the childbirth experience (RR 2.16; 95% CI 1.34 to 3.47, one trial, 40 women) when compared with placebo or no treatment. However, women having non-opioid drugs (NSAIDs or antihistamines) were less likely to be satisfied with pain relief compared with women having opioids (RR 0.50; 95% CI 0.27 to 0.94, one trial, 76 women; RR 0.73; 95% CI 0.54 to 0.98, one trial, 223 women). Women receiving the antihistamine hydroxyzine were more likely to express satisfaction with pain relief compared with the antihistamine promethazine (RR 1.21; 95% CI 1.02 to 1.43, one trial, 289 women). Women receiving sedatives were more likely to express satisfaction with pain relief compared with antihistamines (RR 1.52; 95% CI 1.06 to 2.17, one study, 157 women). The majority of studies were conducted over 30 years ago. The studies were at unclear risk of bias for most of the quality domains.Opioids appear to be superior to non-opioids in satisfaction with pain relief, while non-opioids appear to be superior to placebo for pain relief and satisfaction with the childbirth experience. There were little data and no evidence of a significant difference for any of the comparisons of non-opioids for safety outcomes. AUTHORS'

conclusionsOverall, the findings of this review demonstrated insufficient evidence to support a role for non-opioid drugs on their own to manage pain during labour.

Indexed as

Analgesia, ObstetricalAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticAnalgesics, OpioidAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalFemaleHistamine H1 AntagonistsHumansHydroxyzineHypnotics and SedativesLabor PainPregnancyPromethazineRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicAnalgesics, Non-NarcoticAnalgesics, OpioidAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalHistamine H1 AntagonistsHydroxyzineHypnotics and SedativesPromethazine

Identifiers

PMID22786524
PMCPMC11751596
OpenAlexW1511077914

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.