Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22785431›Full record

ArticleDiagnostic microbiology and infectious disease2012

Comparison of the Roche RealTime ready Influenza A/H1N1 Detection Set with CDC A/H1N1pdm09 RT-PCR on samples from three hospitals in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.

Nguyen thi Tham, Vu thi Ty Hang, Trong Huu Khanh, Do Chau Viet, Tran Tinh Hien, Jeremy Farrar, Nguyen van Vinh Chau, H Rogier van Doorn

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostic microbiology and infectious disease, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Influence of viral load in the outcome of hospitalized patients with influenza virus infection.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2019
    Observational
  3. Article
  4. Impact of severe hematological abnormalities in the outcome of hospitalized patients with influenza virus infection.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2017
    Observational
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Nguyen thi ThamOxford University Clinical Research Unit-Vietnam, Wellcome Trust Major Overseas Program, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.
Vu thi Ty Hang
Trong Huu Khanh
Do Chau Viet
Tran Tinh Hien
Jeremy Farrar
Nguyen van Vinh Chau
H Rogier van Doorn
University of Oxford · GBOxford University Clinical Research Unit · VNChildren's Hospital 1 · VNChildren's Hospital 2 · VNHospital for Tropical Diseases · VN

Funding

NIAID NIH HHS N01 AO050042PHS HHS N01-A0-50042Wellcome Trust 077078/Z/05/ZWellcome Trust 093724
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) can be considered the gold standard for detection of influenza viruses due to its high sensitivity and specificity. Roche has developed the RealTime ready Influenza A/H1N1 Detection Set, consisting of a generic influenza virus A PCR targeting the M2 gene (M2 PCR) and a specific PCR targeting the hemagglutinin (HA) of A/H1N1-pdm09 (HA PCR, 2009 H1N1), with the intention to make a reliable, rapid, and simple test to detect and quantify 2009 H1N1 in clinical samples. We evaluated this kit against the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (USCDC)/World Health Organization real-time PCR for influenza virus using 419 nose and throat swabs from 210 patients collected in 3 large hospitals in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. In the per-patient analysis, when compared to CDC PCR, the sensitivity and specificity of the M2 PCR were 85.8% and 97.6%, respectively; the sensitivity and specificity of HA PCR were 88.2% and 100%, respectively. In the per-sample analysis, the sensitivity and specificity in nose swabs were higher than those in throat swabs for both M2 and HA PCRs. The viral loads as determined with the M2 and HA PCRs correlated well with the Ct values of the CDC PCR. Compared with the CDC PCR, the kit has a reasonable sensitivity and very good specificity for the detection and quantification of influenza A virus and A/H1N1-pdm09. However, given the current status of 2009 H1N1, a kit that can detect all circulating seasonal influenza viruses would be preferable.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHospitalsHumansInfantInfluenza A Virus, H1N1 SubtypeInfluenza, HumanMaleMiddle AgedMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesNosePharynx

Identifiers

PMID22785431
PMCPMC3444637
OpenAlexW2034135700

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.