Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22785131›Full record

ArticleCell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.)2012

Coordinated effects of microRNA-494 induce G₂/M arrest in human cholangiocarcinoma.

Sumitaka Yamanaka, Nathaniel R Campbell, Fangmei An, Scot C Kuo, James J Potter, Esteban Mezey, Anirban Maitra, Florin M Selaru

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cell cycle (Georgetown, Tex.), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. CDC20: a novel therapeutic target in cancer.American journal of translational research · 2023
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. NcRNAs and Cholangiocarcinoma.Journal of Cancer · 2018
    Review
  18. Targeting theOncotarget · 2017
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sumitaka YamanakaDivision of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Nathaniel R Campbell
Fangmei An
Scot C Kuo
James J Potter
Esteban Mezey
Anirban Maitra
Florin M Selaru

Funding

MicroRNA involvement in the regulation of biliary epitheliumK08DK090154 · NIDDK · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SELARU, FLORIN · 2011 to 2015
$706k
NIDDK NIH HHS DK090154-01NIDDK NIH HHS K08 DK090154
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MicroRNA (miRs) have emerged as salient regulators in cancer homeostasis and, recently, as putative therapeutics. Cholangiocarcinomas (CCA) are aggressive cancers with survival usually measured in months. mRNA arrays followed by pathway analysis revealed that miR-494 is a major modulator of the cell cycle progression from gap 2 (G₂) to mitosis (M). We performed fluorescence activated cell sorting (FACS) as well as differential interference contrast (DIC) microscopy, and confirmed that miR-494 induces a significant arrest in G₂/M in CCA cells. Furthermore, we verified that miR-494 modulates the protein level of six genes involved in the G₂/M transition: Polo-like Kinase 1 (PLK1), pituitary tumor-transforming gene 1 (PTTG1), Cyclin B1 (CCNB1), cell-division cycle 2 (CDC2), cell-division cycle 20 (CDC20) and topoisomerase II α (TOP2A). Next, we identified direct binding of miR-494 to the open reading frame (ORF) and downregulation of PTTG1 and TOP2A. In summary, our findings suggest that miR-494 has a global regulatory role in cell cycle progression, exerted by concerted effects on multiple proteins involved in gap 1 (G₁) to synthesis (S), as described previously, as well as G₂ to M progression. Therefore, it appears that the simultaneous effects of a single miR species on multiple targets along the same canonical pathway is advantageous for the usage of miRs as therapeutics. In addition, our data suggest that miRs act within a narrow range. miR expression above the upper threshold does not appear to induce further effects, which is reassuring in terms of off-target effects of miR surrounding noncancerous tissue.

Indexed as

Antigens, NeoplasmBase SequenceBinding SitesCell Cycle ProteinsCell Line, TumorCholangiocarcinomaCyclin B1DNA-Binding ProteinsDNA Topoisomerases, Type IIDown-RegulationFlow CytometryG2 Phase Cell Cycle CheckpointsHumansMicroRNAsM Phase Cell Cycle CheckpointsNeoplasm ProteinsAntigens, NeoplasmCell Cycle ProteinsCyclin B1DNA-Binding ProteinsDNA Topoisomerases, Type IIMicroRNAsMIRN494 microRNA, humanNeoplasm Proteinspituitary tumor-transforming protein 1, humanPolo-Like Kinase 1Poly-ADP-Ribose Binding ProteinsProtein Serine-Threonine KinasesProto-Oncogene ProteinsSecurinTOP2A protein, humanUntranslated Regions

Identifiers

PMID22785131
PMCPMC3409013

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.