Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22783464›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of preventive medicine2012

Is Community-based Participatory Research (CBPR) Useful? A Systematic Review on Papers in a Decade.

Yahya Salimi, Khandan Shahandeh, Hossein Malekafzali, Nina Loori, Azita Kheiltash, Ensiyeh Jamshidi, Ameneh S Frouzan, Reza Majdzadeh

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of preventive medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04461184 (The Great Plains Internet Wellness Study for Aging), which is not on this map. Cited by 110 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
110citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04461184 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

The Great Plains Internet Wellness Study for Aging: The GP I-WAS Project

TypeinterventionalSponsorNorth Dakota State UniversityRan2021 to 2021Enrolled14ConditionsInternet Based Wellness Program, Obesity, Adult PopulationArmsInternet Wellness Intervention for Aging
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

110 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

50 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yahya SalimiDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Khandan Shahandeh
Hossein Malekafzali
Nina Loori
Azita Kheiltash
Ensiyeh Jamshidi
Ameneh S Frouzan
Reza Majdzadeh

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCommunity-based participatory research (CBPR) has been applied by health researchers and practitioners to address health disparities and community empowerment for health promotion. Despite the growing popularity of CBPR projects, there has been little effort to synthesize the literature to evaluate CBPR projects. The present review attempts to identify appropriate elements that may contribute to the successful or unsuccessful interventions.

methodsA systematic review was undertaken using evidence identified through searching electronic databases, web sites, and reference list checks. Predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria were assessed by reviewers. Levels of evidence, accounting for methodologic quality, were assessed for 3 types of CBPR approaches, including interventional, observational, and qualitative research design as well as CBPR elements through separate abstraction forms. Each included study was appraised with 2 quality grades, one for the elements of CBPR and one for research design.

resultsOf 14,222 identified articles, 403 included in the abstract review. Of these, 70 CBPR studies, that 56 intervention studies had different designs, and finally 8 studies met the inclusion criteria. The findings show that collaboration among community partners, researchers, and organizations led to community-level action to improve the health and wellbeing and to minimize health disparities. It enhanced the capacity of the community in terms of research and leadership skills. The result provided examples of effective CBPR that took place in a variety of communities. However, little has been written about the organizational capacities required to make these efforts successful.

conclusionSome evidences were found for potentially effective strategies to increase the participant's levels of CBPR activities. Interventions that included community involvement have the potential to make important differences to levels of activities and should be promoted.

Indexed as

Community-based participatory researcheffectivenessresearchessystematic review

Identifiers

PMID22783464
PMCPMC3389435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.