ArticleFrontiers in evolutionary neuroscience2012
The dual loop model: its relation to language and other modalities.
Article in Frontiers in evolutionary neuroscience, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
26 citing papers in PubMed.
- Limb apraxia and active inference in the visuomotor pathways.Psychonomic bulletin & review · 2026Review
- Unraveling the Thread of Aphasia Rehabilitation: A Translational Cognitive Perspective.Biomedicines · 2023Review
- Speech apraxia and oral apraxia: association or dissociation? A multivariate lesion-symptom mapping study in acute stroke patients.Experimental brain research · 2022Article
- Aphasia recovery by language training using a brain-computer interface: a proof-of-concept study.Brain communications · 2022Article
- Characterising factors underlying praxis deficits in chronic left hemisphere stroke patients.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2021Article
- Extreme capsule is a bottleneck for ventral pathway.IBRO neuroscience reports · 2021Review
- The cerebellum-driven social basis of mathematics: implications for one-on-one tutoring of children with mathematics learning disabilities.Cerebellum & ataxias · 2021Article
- Triple model of auditory sensory processing: a novel gating stream directly links primary auditory areas to executive prefrontal cortex.Acta clinica Croatica · 2020Review
- Structural Disconnection of the Tool Use Network after Left Hemisphere Stroke Predicts Limb Apraxia Severity.Cerebral cortex communications · 2020Article
- The prominent role of the cerebellum in the social learning of the phonological loop in working memory: How language was adaptively built from cerebellar inner speech required during stone-tool making.AIMS neuroscience · 2020Article
- Language-Related White-Matter-Tract Deficits in Children with Benign Epilepsy with Centrotemporal Spikes: A Retrospective Study.Journal of clinical neurology (Seoul, Korea) · 2019Article
- A Role for the Action Observation Network in Apraxia After Stroke.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2019Article
- A Penny for Your Thoughts: Children's Inner Speech and Its Neuro-Development.Frontiers in psychology · 2019Review
- Article
- Motor imagery training induces changes in brain neural networks in stroke patients.Neural regeneration research · 2018Article
- [Networks involved in motor cognition : Physiology and pathophysiology of apraxia].Der Nervenarzt · 2017Review
- Learning, remembering, and predicting how to use tools: Distributed neurocognitive mechanisms: Comment on Osiurak and Badets (2016).Psychological review · 2017Article
- Visual neglect after left-hemispheric lesions: a voxel-based lesion-symptom mapping study in 121 acute stroke patients.Experimental brain research · 2017Article
- Dominant hemisphere functional networks compensate for structural connectivity loss to preserve phonological retrieval with aging.Brain and behavior · 2016Article
- A review on functional and structural brain connectivity in numerical cognition.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2015Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The current neurobiological consensus of a general dual loop system scaffolding human and primate brains gives evidence that the dorsal and ventral connections subserve similar functions, independent of the modality and species. However, most current commentators agree that although bees dance and chimpanzees grunt, these systems of communication differ qualitatively from human language. So why is language unique to humans? We discuss anatomical differences between humans and other animals, the meaning of lesion studies in patients, the role of inner speech, and compare functional imaging studies in language with other modalities in respect to the dual loop model. These aspects might be helpful for understanding what kind of biological system the language faculty is, and how it relates to other systems in our own species and others.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.