Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22783169›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neural circuits2012

Surround suppression and sparse coding in visual and barrel cortices.

Robert N S Sachdev, Matthew R Krause, James A Mazer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neural circuits, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Synaptic dynamics govern spatial integration in mouse visual cortex.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Synthetic surprise as the foundation of the psychedelic experience.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Recurrent dynamics in the cerebral cortex: Integration of sensory evidence with stored knowledge.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Seasonal plasticity in the adult somatosensory cortex.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Layer 3 Dynamically Coordinates Columnar Activity According to Spatial Context.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Robert N S SachdevDepartment of Neurobiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven CT, USA.
Matthew R Krause
James A Mazer

Funding

CELLULAR MECHANISMS OF VISUAL CORTICAL FUNCTIONR01EY012388 · NEI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI MAZER, JAMES A, MCCORMICK, DAVID · 1999 to 2010
$2.6M
Allocation and Control of Visual AttentionR01EY018854 · NEI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI MAZER, JAMES A · 2009 to 2010
$775k
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY012388NEI NIH HHS R01 EY018854
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

During natural vision the entire retina is stimulated. Likewise, during natural tactile behaviors, spatially extensive regions of the somatosensory surface are co-activated. The large spatial extent of naturalistic stimulation means that surround suppression, a phenomenon whose neural mechanisms remain a matter of debate, must arise during natural behavior. To identify common neural motifs that might instantiate surround suppression across modalities, we review models of surround suppression and compare the evidence supporting the competing ideas that surround suppression has either cortical or sub-cortical origins in visual and barrel cortex. In the visual system there is general agreement lateral inhibitory mechanisms contribute to surround suppression, but little direct experimental evidence that intracortical inhibition plays a major role. Two intracellular recording studies of V1, one using naturalistic stimuli (Haider et al., 2010), the other sinusoidal gratings (Ozeki et al., 2009), sought to identify the causes of reduced activity in V1 with increasing stimulus size, a hallmark of surround suppression. The former attributed this effect to increased inhibition, the latter to largely balanced withdrawal of excitation and inhibition. In rodent primary somatosensory barrel cortex, multi-whisker responses are generally weaker than single whisker responses, suggesting multi-whisker stimulation engages similar surround suppressive mechanisms. The origins of suppression in S1 remain elusive: studies have implicated brainstem lateral/internuclear interactions and both thalamic and cortical inhibition. Although the anatomical organization and instantiation of surround suppression in the visual and somatosensory systems differ, we consider the idea that one common function of surround suppression, in both modalities, is to remove the statistical redundancies associated with natural stimuli by increasing the sparseness or selectivity of sensory responses.

Indexed as

inhibitionS1somatosensory cortexsparse codingsuppressionV1vibrissaevisual cortex

Identifiers

PMID22783169
PMCPMC3389675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.