ArticleInfection2013
MRSA decolonization: success rate, risk factors for failure and optimal duration of follow-up.
Article in Infection, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Methodologic considerations of household-level methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus decolonization among persons living with HIV.American journal of infection control · 2017Trial
- Effect of maternal skin-to-skin contact on decolonization of Methicillin-Oxacillin-Resistant Staphylococcus in neonatal intensive care units: a randomized controlled trial.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2015Trial
- Infection Prevention and Control Strategies According to the Type of Multidrug-Resistant Bacteria andAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Prevalence of Staphylococcus aureus colonization in patients for total joint arthroplasty in South Africa.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2020Article
- Methicillin-ResistantInfectious diseases · 2020Review
- Impact of Decolonization Protocols and Recurrence in Pediatric MRSA Skin and Soft-Tissue Infections.The Journal of surgical research · 2019Article
- Impact of Mobility on Methicillin-ResistantAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
- Transmission dynamics for Methicilin-resistant Staphalococous areus with injection drug user.BMC infectious diseases · 2018Article
- Association of Environmental Contamination in the Home With the Risk for Recurrent Community-Associated, Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infection.JAMA internal medicine · 2016Article
- Integrated MRSA-Management (IMM) with prolonged decolonization treatment after hospital discharge is effective: a single centre, non-randomised open-label trial.Antimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2016Article
- Strategic measures for the control of surging antimicrobial resistance in Hong Kong and mainland of China.Emerging microbes & infections · 2015Review
- Efficacy of the decolonization of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus carriers in clinical practice.Antimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeMethicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) decolonization is a widely established, though controversial part of many MRSA controlling strategies. The aim of this study was to evaluate our decolonization success rate, identify the risk factors for decolonization failure and determine the optimal duration of follow-up in our low MRSA prevalence setting (2.6 % of isolates).
methodsEvery patient with newly detected MRSA colonization or infection between January 2007 and December 2009 was recruited to the study. The MRSA strategy of our institution (a 700 bed tertiary hospital in eastern Switzerland) consists of a 5-day regimen of nasal mupirocin ointment, chlorhexidin mouth rinse and whole body wash with didecyldimonium chloride. Systemic antibiotics are usually not added to the regimen.
resultsWe determined a MRSA decolonization success rate of 65 % (33/51) after a median follow-up of 13 months [i.e. a tripling of the spontaneous clearance rate of 22 % (6/27) in the non-decolonized group]. The most important risk factor for decolonization failure was colonization of the respiratory tract [odds risk (OR) 9.1, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.2-66.7], as well as isolation of MRSA spa-type 002 ([R 5.8, 95 % CI 1.0-33.3). Of all the episodes of MRSA recurrence, 88 % (14/16) were detected within 270 days after decolonization.
conclusionHigh MRSA decolonization success rates can be achieved without the routine use of oral antibiotics. A time period of 1 year after decolonization seems to be a reasonable duration of follow-up in our setting. We encourage other institutions to take into account local MRSA epidemiology (e.g. predominance of certain subtypes) for the management of MRSA patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22782694What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.