Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22782529›Full record

ArticleArthritis and rheumatism2012

No differences in cancer screening rates in patients with rheumatoid arthritis compared to the general population.

Seoyoung C Kim, Sebastian Schneeweiss, Jessica A Myers, Jun Liu, Daniel H Solomon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Arthritis and rheumatism, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Seoyoung C KimBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachussetts 02120, USA. skim62@partners.org
Sebastian Schneeweiss
Jessica A Myers
Jun Liu
Daniel H Solomon
Brigham and Women's Hospital · US

Funding

Trial of risk mangement for prevention of accelerated atherosclerosis in SLEP60AR047782 · NIAMS · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI LOSINA, ELENA · 2001 to 2016
$18.8M
Modifiable Disparities in Treatment for Rheumatoid ArthritisR01AR056215 · NIAMS · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI SOLOMON, DANIEL HAL · 2009 to 2012
$1.9M
Patient Centered Outcomes Research in RheumatologyK24AR055989 · NIAMS · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI SOLOMON, DANIEL HAL · 2008 to 2017
$1.5M
Cervical Dysplasia and Human Papillomavirus Infection in Rheumatoid Arthritis.K23AR059677 · NIAMS · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI KIM, SEOYOUNG CATHERINE · 2010 to 2014
$680k
Osteonecrosis of the Jaw in Non-Cancer Patients Using BisphosphonatesR21DE018750 · NIDCR · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI SOLOMON, DANIEL HAL · 2009 to 2010
$489k
NIAMS NIH HHS K23 AR059677NIAMS NIH HHS K23-AR-059677NIAMS NIH HHS K24 AR055989NIAMS NIH HHS K24-AR-055989NIAMS NIH HHS P60 AR047782NIAMS NIH HHS P60-AR-047782NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR056215NIAMS NIH HHS R01-AR-056215NIDCR NIH HHS R21 DE018750NIDCR NIH HHS R21-DE-018750
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePrevious study findings have suggested that patients with chronic diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA) do not receive optimal preventive medical services, including cancer screening tests. This study was undertaken to evaluate cancer screening rates in RA patients compared to non-RA control populations.

methodsUsing data from a large US commercial insurance plan, we examined rates of screening tests for cervical, breast, and colon cancer in patients with RA compared to control subjects without RA (non-RA controls) or control subjects with hypertension. Individuals were included in the RA cohort if they had at least 2 visits coded for a diagnosis of RA and had received at least 1 prescription for a disease-modifying antirheumatic drug during the study period. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare the rates of different cancer screening tests between RA patients and non-RA controls.

resultsRA patients (n = 13,314) and control subjects (non-RA and hypertension controls) (n = 212,324) were screened, on average, once every 3 years for cervical cancer and once every 2 years for breast cancer during the followup period (mean 2.3 years of followup). In the age-adjusted Cox regression model, women with RA were more likely to receive ≥ 1 Papanicolaou smear (hazard ratio [HR] 1.21, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.17-1.24), ≥ 1 mammogram (HR 1.49, 95% CI 1.45-1.53), and ≥ 1 colonoscopy (HR 1.69, 95% CI 1.61-1.77) compared to female non-RA control subjects. Men with RA were also more likely to receive at least 1 colonoscopy (HR 1.52, 95% CI 1.40-1.64) than were male non-RA control subjects. These results were robust in multivariable analyses adjusted for age, number of physician visits, percentage of visits made to primary care physicians, and the Charlson Comorbidity Index.

conclusionPatients with RA did not appear to be at risk for receiving fewer cancer screening tests when compared to individuals without RA. The majority of both RA patients and non-RA control subjects were screened regularly for cervical, breast, and colon cancer, in accordance with current recommendations.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedArthritis, RheumatoidBreast NeoplasmsColonic NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansMaleMammographyMiddle AgedPapanicolaou TestRisk FactorsUterine Cervical NeoplasmsVaginal Smears

Identifiers

PMID22782529
PMCPMC3462284
OpenAlexW2024362830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.