Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22782257›Full record

ArticleClinical oral investigations2013

Influence of a mouthwash containing hydroxyapatite microclusters on bacterial adherence in situ.

C Hannig, S Basche, T Burghardt, A Al-Ahmad, M Hannig

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Biomimetic hydroxyapatite and caries prevention: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Canadian journal of dental hygiene : CJDH = Journal canadien de l'hygiene dentaire : JCHD · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. A Fresh Look at Mouthwashes-What Is Inside and What Is It For?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  16. Antimicrobial Effects ofNutrients · 2021
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Hydroxyapatite in Oral Care Products-A Review.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

C HannigClinic of Operative Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine Carl Gustav Carus, Technical University of Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany. christian.hannig@uniklinikum-dresden.de
S Basche
T Burghardt
A Al-Ahmad
M Hannig

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of the present study was to investigate the efficacy of a new preparation in dental prophylaxis containing zinc-carbonate hydroxyapatite microclusters (Biorepair) for oral biofilm management. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Initial biofilm formation was carried out in situ with bovine enamel slabs fixed to individual upper jaw splints worn by six subjects. Rinses with the customary preparation as well as with subfractions (hydroxyapatite microclusters in saline solution; liquid phase without particles) were adopted for 1 min in situ after 1 min of pellicle formation, and the bacterial colonization was recorded after 6 h and 12 h, respectively. Rinses with chlorhexidine served as a reference. The adherent microorganisms were quantified and visualized using DAPI staining and live-dead staining (BacLight). Furthermore, the effects on Streptococcus mutans bacteria were tested in vitro (BacLight).

resultsApplication of the customary preparation and of the separate components distinctly reduced the initial bacterial colonization of the enamel surface in situ as visualized and quantified with all techniques. After 12 h, 1.3 × 10(7) ± 2.0 × 10(7) bacteria/cm² were detected on unrinsed control samples with DAPI staining; 2.4 × 10(6) ± 3.3 × 10(6) after application of Biorepair (12 h after CHX-rinse; 1.3 × 10(5) ± 9.2 × 10(4)). Also, pure hydroxyapatite microclusters in saline solution (2.1 × 10(6) ± 3.0 × 10(6)) as well as the liquid phase without particles (5.1 × 10(5) ± 3.3 × 10(5)) reduced the amount of adherent bacteria. Furthermore, antimicrobial effects on S. mutans were observed in vitro.

conclusionThe preparation is an effective compound for biofilm management in the oral cavity due to antiadherent and antibacterial effects. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The tested mouthrinse seems to be a reasonable amendment for dental prophylaxis.

Indexed as

AnimalsBacterial AdhesionBiofilmsCarbonatesCattleDrug CombinationsDurapatiteFluorescenceHumansMicrobial ViabilityMouthwashesParticle SizeSorbitolStatistics, NonparametricStreptococcus mutansXylitolCarbonatesDrug CombinationsDurapatiteMouthwashesSorbitolXylitolzinc carbonateZinc Compounds

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.