Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22781993›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners2012

Presenting symptoms of children with cancer: a primary-care population-based study.

Jette Møller Ahrensberg, Rikke Pilegaard Hansen, Frede Olesen, Henrik Schrøder, Peter Vedsted

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Danish Childhood Cancer Registry.Clinical epidemiology · 2016
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Risk of childhood cancer with symptoms in primary care: a population-based case-control study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2013
    Article
  14. Primary care of children: the unique role of GPs.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2012
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jette Møller AhrensbergSection for General Practice, Department of Public Health, Research Centre for Cancer Diagnosis in Primary Care, Aarhus University, Denmark. jette.ahrensberg@alm.au.dk
Rikke Pilegaard Hansen
Frede Olesen
Henrik Schrøder
Peter Vedsted

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundKnowledge of how children with cancer present in general practice is sparse. Timely referral from general practice is important to ensure early diagnosis.

aimTo investigate the presenting symptoms and GPs' interpretations of symptoms of children with cancer. DESIGN AND

settingA Danish nationwide population-based study including children (<15 years) with an incident cancer diagnosis (January 2007 to December 2010).

methodA questionnaire on symptoms and their interpretation was mailed to GPs (n=363). Symptoms were classified according to the International Classification of Primary Care (ICPC)-2 classification.

resultsGPs' response rate was 87% (315/363) and GPs were involved in the diagnostic process of 253 (80.3%) children. Symptoms were few (2.4 per child) and most fell into the category 'general and unspecified' (71.9%), apart from patients with tumours of the central nervous system (CNS), whose symptoms fell mostly in the category 'neurological' (for example, headache). Symptoms like pain, swelling/lump, or fatigue were reported in 25% of the patients and they were the most commonly reported symptoms. GPs interpreted children's symptoms as alarm symptoms in 20.2%, as serious (that is, not alarm) symptoms in 52.9%, and as vague symptoms in 26.9%. GPs' interpretation varied significantly by diagnosis (P<0.001).

conclusionChildren with cancer presented with few symptoms in general practice, of which most were 'general and unspecified' symptoms. Only 20% presented alarm symptoms, while 27% presented vague and non-specific symptoms. This low level of alarm symptoms may influence the time from symptom presentation in general practice to final diagnosis.

Indexed as

General PracticeAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolDenmarkEarly Detection of CancerHumansInfantNeoplasmsPractice Patterns, Physicians'Referral and ConsultationRegistriesSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID22781993
PMCPMC3381271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.