ArticleNature biotechnology2012
Incorporating biomarkers into clinical trial designs: points to consider.
Article in Nature biotechnology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Feasibility, safety, and adequacy of research biopsies for cancer clinical trials at an academic medical center.PloS one · 2019Trial
- Artificial intelligence fusion for predicting survival of rectal cancer patients using immunohistochemical expression of Ras homolog family member B in biopsy.Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2023Article
- Radiogenomics is the future of treatment response assessment in clinical oncology.Medical physics · 2018Article
- Drugs' development in acute heart failure: what went wrong?Heart failure reviews · 2018Review
- Advances in the design of nanomaterial-based electrochemical affinity and enzymatic biosensors for metabolic biomarkers: A review.Mikrochimica acta · 2018Review
- Biomarker-Guided Non-Adaptive Trial Designs in Phase II and Phase III: A Methodological Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2017Review
- Biomarker-Guided Adaptive Trial Designs in Phase II and Phase III: A Methodological Review.PloS one · 2016Review
- Creative trial design in RA: optimizing patient outcomes.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2013Article
- The Importance of Biopsy in the Era of Molecular Medicine.Cancer journal (Sudbury, Mass.)Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22781677What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.