Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22781303›Full record

ArticleCritical care (London, England)2012

Hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF1α) gene expression in human shock states.

Julien Textoris, Nathalie Beaufils, Gabrielle Quintana, Amin Ben Lassoued, Laurent Zieleskiewicz, Sandrine Wiramus, Valéry Blasco, Nathalie Lesavre, Claude Martin, Jean Gabert and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Critical care (London, England), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Coronavirus (Covid-19) sepsis: revisiting mitochondrial dysfunction in pathogenesis, aging, inflammation, and mortality.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Immunometabolism and Sepsis: A Role for HIF?Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2019
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Sepsis-associated hyperlactatemia.Critical care (London, England) · 2014
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Julien TextorisService d’anesthésie et de réanimation, Hôpital Nord, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Marseille, Chemin des bourrely, 13915, Marseille, France. julien.textoris@gmail.com
Nathalie Beaufils
Gabrielle Quintana
Amin Ben Lassoued
Laurent Zieleskiewicz
Sandrine Wiramus
Valéry Blasco
Nathalie Lesavre
Claude Martin
Jean Gabert
Marc Leone
Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille · FRHôpital Nord · FRInserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHypoxia-inducible factor-1 (HIF1) controls the expression of genes involved in the cellular response to hypoxia. No information is available on its expression in critically ill patients. Thus, we designed the first clinical study in order to evaluate the role of HIF1α as a prognosis marker in patients with shock.

methods50 consecutive adult patients with shock and 11 healthy volunteers were prospectively included. RNA was extracted from whole blood samples and expression of HIF1α was assessed over the first 4 hours of shock. The primary objective was to assess HIF1α as a prognostic marker in shock. Secondary objectives were to evaluate the role of HIF1α as a diagnostic and follow-up marker. Patient survival was evaluated at day 28.

resultsThe causes of shock were sepsis (78%), hemorrhage (18%), and cardiac dysfunction (4%). The HIF1α expression was significantly higher in the shock patients than in the healthy volunteers (121 [72-168] vs. 48 [38-54] normalized copies, p < 0.01), whatever the measured isoforms. It was similar in non-survivors and survivors (108 [range 84-183] vs. 121 [range 72-185] normalized copies, p = 0.92), and did not significantly change within the study period.

conclusionsThe present study is the first to demonstrate the increased expression of HIF1α in patients with shock. Further studies are needed to clarify the potential association with outcome. Our findings reinforce the value of monitoring plasma lactate levels to guide the treatment of shock.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleGene ExpressionHeart ArrestHemorrhageHumansHypoxia-Inducible Factor 1, alpha SubunitMaleReference ValuesRNA, MessengerSepsisShockHIF1A protein, humanHypoxia-Inducible Factor 1, alpha SubunitRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID22781303
PMCPMC3580697
OpenAlexW2106498336

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.