ReviewCurrent opinion in obstetrics & gynecology2012
Long-acting reversible contraception for adolescents.
Review in Current opinion in obstetrics & gynecology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.
- Disparities in perceptions of long-acting reversible contraceptives among patients in Delaware Title X clinics.Contraception · 2025Article
- Correlates of long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) use among young women in Southern Africa: a secondary analysis from HPTN 082.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Knowledge of and access to contraceptive information and services among teenagers with child welfare involvement: A descriptive study across the transition to high school.Children and youth services review · 2024Article
- Why-UD? Assessing the requirement to trial an intrauterine device as a condition for elective sterilisation in female patients.Journal of medical ethics · 2024Article
- Factors associated with long-acting reversible contraceptives usage among sexually active adolescent girls and young women in Zimbabwe.PLOS global public health · 2024Article
- Factors associated with unintended pregnancy and contraceptive practices in justice-involved adolescent girls in Australia.PloS one · 2024Article
- Impact of polymer crosslinking on release mechanisms from long-acting levonorgestrel intrauterine systems.International journal of pharmaceutics · 2022Article
- Factors influencing contraceptive decision making and use among young adolescents in urban Lilongwe, Malawi: a qualitative study.Reproductive health · 2021Article
- Lessons Learned from Longer Acting Reversible Contraception Applied to Longer Acting HIV Prevention Technologies.Current HIV/AIDS reports · 2021Review
- Use of nonpreferred contraceptive methods among women in Ohio.Contraception · 2021Article
- The Impact of Progestin-only Contraception on Adolescents with Macromastia.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2021Article
- Determinants of Long-acting Reversible Contraception (LARC) Initial and Continued Use among Adolescents in the United States.Adolescent research review · 2020Article
- Factors associated with sexual and reproductive health behaviour of street-involved young people: findings from a baseline survey in Southwest Nigeria.Reproductive health · 2020Article
- Use of and access to oral and injectable contraceptives in Brazil.Revista de saude publica · 2016Article
- Leading With LARCs in Nigeria: The Stars Are Aligned to Expand Effective Family Planning Services Decisively.Global health, science and practice · 2016Article
- Understanding the low uptake of long-acting reversible contraception by young women in Australia: a qualitative study.BMC women's health · 2015Article
- Pregnancy intention and use of contraception among Hispanic women in the United States: data from the National Survey of Family Growth, 2006-2010.Journal of women's health (2002) · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purpose of reviewTeen pregnancy continues to plague the United States. This review will discuss long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) method use in teens, comprising intrauterine devices and subdermal implants. RECENT
findingsThe American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists along with the American Academy of Pediatrics, the Centers for Disease Control, and the World Health Organization have recognized the potential impact of LARC (comprising intrauterine contraception and subdermal implants) to reduce unintended pregnancies. They have affirmed the safety of such devices, and no effects on long-term fertility have been identified. Teen users of these methods have been shown to have high continuation and satisfaction rates. On the contrary, oral contraceptive pills, the patch, and the contraceptive vaginal ring have significantly higher contraceptive failure rates, and these rates are magnified in young women. SUMMARY: LARC methods should be considered first-line options for teens seeking contraception.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.