Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22779693›Full record

Trial reportAlimentary pharmacology & therapeutics2012

Randomised clinical trial: alosetron improves quality of life and reduces restriction of daily activities in women with severe diarrhoea-predominant IBS.

F Cremonini, J P Nicandro, V Atkinson, R Shringarpure, E Chuang, A Lembo

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.9field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 64 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Potential neuro-immune therapeutic targets in irritable bowel syndrome.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2020
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Update on Pharmacotherapy for Irritable Bowel Syndrome.Current gastroenterology reports · 2019
    Review
  12. The Impact of Revascularisation on Quality of Life in Chronic Mesenteric Ischemia.Canadian journal of gastroenterology & hepatology · 2019
    Article
  13. 5-HTAmerican journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology · 2019
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. RGS proteins as targets in the treatment of intestinal inflammation and visceral pain: New insights and future perspectives.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2016
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

F CremoniniDivision of Gastroenterology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA02215, USA. fcremoni@bidmc.harvard.edu
J P Nicandro
V Atkinson
R Shringarpure
E Chuang
A Lembo
VA Southern Nevada Healthcare System · USBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPatients with irritable bowel syndrome with diarrhoea (IBS-D) experience restriction in daily activities and decreased health-related quality of life (QOL).

aimTo investigate effects of alosetron on patient-reported health-related QOL, satisfaction and productivity in women with severe IBS-D.

methodsA total of 705 women (severe IBS-D, Rome II criteria) randomised to alosetron 0.5 mg QD, 1 mg QD, 1 mg BID, or placebo for 12 weeks were studied. IBSQOL, treatment satisfaction, daily activities, and lost workplace productivity (LWP) were evaluated at randomisation and Week 12.

resultsOne or more doses of alosetron significantly improved all IBSQOL domains except for sexual function from baseline vs. placebo. The magnitude of IBSQOL changes was consistent with a clinically meaningful effect. Alosetron 0.5 mg QD and 1 mg BID significantly reduced IBS interference with social/leisure activities and LWP from baseline vs. placebo [social/leisure (mean ±S.E.) days lost: -6.7 ± 0.8, -7.0 ± 0.9, P < 0.01; LWP (mean ± S.E.) h lost: -11.0 ± 3.3, -21.1 ± 4.1, P < 0.05 respectively]. Significantly more patients treated with alosetron reported satisfaction vs. placebo. Improvements in IBSQOL, LWP, and treatment satisfaction significantly correlated with global improvement of IBS symptoms. The incidence of adverse events with alosetron was low with constipation being the most commonly reported event. A single case of ischaemic colitis occurred, in a patient receiving alosetron 0.5 mg QD.

conclusionsIn women with severe IBS-D, alosetron treatment, including 0.5 mg QD, resulted in statistically significant and clinically relevant improvements in health-related QOL, restriction of daily activities and treatment satisfaction over placebo. IBS symptom improvement corresponded with positive changes in IBSQOL, LWP and treatment satisfaction.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingQuality of LifeAdultCarbolinesConstipationDiarrheaDose-Response Relationship, DrugFemaleGastrointestinal AgentsHumansIrritable Bowel SyndromeMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionSeverity of Illness IndexTreatment OutcomealosetronCarbolinesGastrointestinal Agents

Identifiers

PMID22779693
PMCPMC3464357
OpenAlexW2043222610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.