Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22779050›Full record

ArticleAMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science2012

Using temporal patterns in medical records to discern adverse drug events from indications.

Yi Liu, Paea Lependu, Srinivasan Iyer, Nigam H Shah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Extraction of Temporal Information from Clinical Narratives.Journal of healthcare informatics research · 2019
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. The Safety of Drug Therapy in Children.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2015
    Review
  8. A method for systematic discovery of adverse drug events from clinical notes.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2015
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Standardizing adverse drug event reporting data.Journal of biomedical semantics · 2014
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Identifying phenotypic signatures of neuropsychiatric disorders from electronic medical records.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2013
    Article
  15. Pharmacovigilance using clinical notes.Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics · 2013
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Automated Detection of Systematic Off-label Drug Use in Free Text of Electronic Medical Records.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2013
    Article
  18. Learning signals of adverse drug-drug interactions from the unstructured text of electronic health records.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2013
    Article
  19. ADEpedia 2.0: Integration of Normalized Adverse Drug Events (ADEs) Knowledge from the UMLS.AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science proceedings. AMIA Joint Summits on Translational Science · 2013
    Article
  20. The coming age of data-driven medicine: translational bioinformatics' next frontier.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2012
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yi LiuStanford University, Stanford, CA.
Paea Lependu
Srinivasan Iyer
Nigam H Shah

Funding

STANFORD COMPOSITE(RMI)U54HG004028 · NHGRI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI MUSEN, MARK A · 2005 to 2014
$36.2M
NHGRI NIH HHS U54 HG004028
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Researchers estimate that electronic health record systems record roughly 2-million ambulatory adverse drug events and that patients suffer from adverse drug events in roughly 30% of hospital stays. Some have used structured databases of patient medical records and health insurance claims recently-going beyond the current paradigm of using spontaneous reporting systems like AERS-to detect drug-safety signals. However, most efforts do not use the free-text from clinical notes in monitoring for drug-safety signals. We hypothesize that drug-disease co-occurrences, extracted from ontology-based annotations of the clinical notes, can be examined for statistical enrichment and used for drug safety surveillance. When analyzing such co-occurrences of drugs and diseases, one major challenge is to differentiate whether the disease in a drug-disease pair represents an indication or an adverse event. We demonstrate that it is possible to make this distinction by combining the frequency distribution of the drug, the disease, and the drug-disease pair as well as the temporal ordering of the drugs and diseases in each pair across more than one million patients.

Identifiers

PMID22779050
PMCPMC3392062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.