Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22778908›Full record

ArticleJournal of transplantation2012

The major histocompatibility complex in transplantation.

Marco Antonio Ayala García, Beatriz González Yebra, Andrea Liliana López Flores, Eduardo Guaní Guerra

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of transplantation, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 112 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Measurement of the Adipose Stem Cells Cell Sheets Transmittance.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Identification of peripheral CD154Clinical and experimental immunology · 2021
    Article
  16. Procedures for Fecal Microbiota Transplantation in Murine Microbiome Studies.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. HLA and lung transplantation.Frontiers of medicine · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marco Antonio Ayala GarcíaInvestigación, Hospital Regional de Alta Especialidad del Bajío, Blvd. Milenio No. 130, San Carlos/La Roncha, 37660 León, GTO, Mexico.
Beatriz González Yebra
Andrea Liliana López Flores
Eduardo Guaní Guerra
Hospital Regional de Alta Especialidad del Bajío · MXUniversidad de Guanajuato · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The transplant of organs is one of the greatest therapeutic achievements of the twentieth century. In organ transplantation, the adaptive immunity is considered the main response exerted to the transplanted tissue, since the principal target of the immune response is the MHC (major histocompatibility complex) molecules expressed on the surface of donor cells. However, we should not forget that the innate and adaptive immunities are closely interrelated and should be viewed as complementary and cooperating. When a human transplant is performed, HLA (human leukocyte antigens) molecules from a donor are recognized by the recipient's immune system triggering an alloimmune response Matching of donor and recipient for MHC antigens has been shown to have a significant positive effect on graft acceptance. This paper will present MHC, the innate and adaptive immunities, and clinical HLA testing.

Identifiers

PMID22778908
PMCPMC3388305
OpenAlexW1997105977

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.