Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22778501›Full record

ArticleFood research international (Ottawa, Ont.)2012

Development and application of loop-mediated isothermal amplification assays on rapid detection of various types of staphylococci strains.

Zhenbo Xu, Lin Li, Jin Chu, Brian M Peters, Megan L Harris, Bing Li, Lei Shi, Mark E Shirtliff

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food research international (Ottawa, Ont.), 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Rapid and visual detection of Shiga-toxigenic Escherichia coli (STEC) in carabeef meat harnessing loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP).Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology] · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Antimicrobial Resistance, SCCAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Biofilm formation of two genetically diverseFrontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  9. A culture-free biphasic approach for sensitive and rapid detection of pathogens in dried whole-blood matrix.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. One-Day Molecular Detection ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Zhenbo XuCollege of Light Industry and Food Sciences, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.
Lin Li
Jin Chu
Brian M Peters
Megan L Harris
Bing Li
Lei Shi
Mark E Shirtliff

Funding

Staphylococcus aureus biofilms: in vitro and in vivo studiesR01AI069568 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI SHIRTLIFF, MARK E · 2007 to 2011
$2.1M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI069568
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) method for rapid detection of various Staphylococcus strains and associated antibiotic resistance determinant had been developed and evaluated in this study. Six primers, including outer primers, inner primers and loop primers, were specially designed for recognizing eight distinct sequences on three targets: 16SrRNA, femA and mecA.. Forty-one reference strains, including various species of gram-negative and -positive isolates, were included in this study to evaluate and optimize LAMP assays. The optimal reaction condition was found to be 65 °C for 45 min, with detection limits at 100 fg DNA/tube and 10 CFU/reaction for 16S rRNA, 100 fg DNA/tube and 10 CFU/reaction for femA, 1 pg DNA/tube and 100 CFU/reaction for mecA, respectively. Application of LAMP assays were performed on 118 various types of Staphylococcus isolates, the detection rate of LAMP assays for the 16SrRNA, femA and mecA was 100% (118/118), 98.5% (64/65) and 94.3% (66/70), and the negative predictive value (NPV) was 100%, 98.1% and 92.3% respectively; with a 100% positive predictive value (PPV) for all three targets. In conclusion, LAMP assays were demonstrated to be useful and powerful tools for rapid detection of various Staphylococcus strains, and undoubtedly, the rapidness, technical simplicity, and cost-effectiveness of LAMP assays will demonstrate broad application for bacteriological detection of food-borne Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus (MRS) isolates.

Identifiers

PMID22778501
PMCPMC3390935

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.