Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22777878›Full record

Trial reportAnnals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine2012

A psychoeducational intervention (SWEEP) for depressed women with diabetes.

Sue M Penckofer, Carol Ferrans, Patricia Mumby, Mary Byrn, Mary Ann Emanuele, Patrick R Harrison, Ramon A Durazo-Arvizu, Patrick Lustman

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Annals of behavioral medicine : a publication of the Society of Behavioral Medicine, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Nurse-led psychological intervention for type 2 diabetes: a cluster randomised controlled trial (Diabetes-6 study) in primary care.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2018
    Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sue M PenckoferSchool of Nursing, Loyola University Chicago, Maywood, IL, USA. spencko@luc.edu
Carol Ferrans
Patricia Mumby
Mary Byrn
Mary Ann Emanuele
Patrick R Harrison
Ramon A Durazo-Arvizu
Patrick Lustman
Loyola University Chicago · USSaint Mary's College · USUniversity of Illinois Chicago · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Research Design, Data, and Analytics CoreP30DK092949 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI Ronald T. Ackermann, MARSHALL H CHIN · 2011 to 2026
$10.0M
A Psychoeducational Intervention for Women with DiabetesK23NR009240 · NINR · LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO · PI PENCKOFER, SUE M · 2006 to 2008
$387k
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092949NINR NIH HHS K23 NR009240NINR NIH HHS K-23: NR009420
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinically significant depression is present in 25 % of individuals with type 2 diabetes, its risk being doubled in women. PURPOSE: To examine the effectiveness of the Study of Women's Emotions and Evaluation of a Psychoeducational (SWEEP), a group therapy for depression treatment based on cognitive behavioral therapy principles that was developed for women with type 2 diabetes was conducted.

methodsWomen with significantly elevated depression symptoms (Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale ≥16) were randomized to SWEEP (n = 38) or usual care (UC, n = 36).

resultsMultilevel modeling indicated that SWEEP was more effective than UC in reducing depression (mean difference of -15 vs. -7, p < .01), decreasing trait anxiety (mean difference of -15 vs. -5, p < .01), and improving anger expression (mean difference of -12 vs. -5, p < .05). Although SWEEP and UC had improvements in fasting glucose (mean difference of -24 vs. -1 mg/dl) and HbA1c (mean difference of -0.4 vs. -0.1 %), there were no statistically significant differences between groups.

conclusionsSWEEP was more effective than UC for treating depressed women with type 2 diabetes. Addition of group therapy for depression meaningfully expands the armamentarium of evidence-based treatment options for women with diabetes.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCognitive Behavioral TherapyDepressionDepressive DisorderDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleHealth StatusHumansMiddle AgedPsychotherapy, GroupQuality of LifeTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID22777878
PMCPMC3682680
OpenAlexW2007940196

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.