ArticleJournal of community genetics2013
Erratum to: Genetic services and testing in Brazil.
Article in Journal of community genetics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum for
Authors and funding
4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Brazil is a continent-size country with around 190 million inhabitants, the largest and most populous in South America. It is classified as a developing upper middle-income country and having considerable growth, although inequality remains significant. The health system is mixed; most of the population is served by the public Unified Health System ("Sistema Único de Saúde", SUS) and there is a thriving private health sector. The country faces multiple obstacles to improve and expand genetic services, due to its wide territory, sociocultural inequalities and major basic health problems. Most comprehensive genetic services are concentrated in large urban centers in the South and Southeast regions, mainly in tertiary care university hospitals. Demand for genetic services has increased and congenital malformations has been the second cause of infant mortality since 2000, but such data did not determine government policies or initiatives for the prevention and management of this group of problems until 2004, when the process for introducing medical genetics as a health policy by the Ministry of Health began. Details on the policy and an overview on congenital and genetic diseases, the state and availability of genetic services, genetic testing, medical genetics laboratories, training of human resources in medical genetics, newborn screening program, genetics networks, special care facilities, as well as educational, social and support programs for disabled people, research priorities in genetics and genomics, patient organizations and relevant issues regarding the challenge of implementing a comprehensive care policy in clinical genetics in this vast and diverse country are presented.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.