Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22777541›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of obesity (2005)2013

The epidemiology of weight counseling for adults in the United States: a case of positive deviance.

J L Kraschnewski, C N Sciamanna, K I Pollak, H L Stuckey, N E Sherwood

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of obesity (2005), 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.4field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A systematic review of motivational interviewing for weight loss among adults in primary care.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2015
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

J L KraschnewskiDepartment of Medicine, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Cetner, Penn State College of Medicine, Hershey, PA 17033, USA. jkraschnewski@hmc.psu.edu
C N Sciamanna
K I Pollak
H L Stuckey
N E Sherwood
Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center · USDuke Medical Center · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

Obesity and Energy Metabolism CoreP30DK050456 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI BERNLOHR, DAVID A · 1995 to 2015
$17.0M
Translational Research Core - Health Engagement & Action Translational (HEAT)P30DK092924 · NIDDK · KAISER FOUNDATION RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI Alyce Sophia Adams, HILARY Kessler SELIGMAN · 2011 to 2026
$9.2M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK050456NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092924
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Weight counseling for adults is uncommonly performed by primary-care providers (PCPs), despite recommendations. In order to design effective primary-care interventions, a full understanding of the epidemiology of weight counseling in primary care is needed. Our objective was to measure the frequency of weight counseling at the level of the PCP. We performed a cross-sectional study of 21 220 US adult outpatient primary-care visits with 954 PCPs in 2007-2008, using data from the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS). Most (58%) PCPs performed no weight counseling during any patient visits. A total of 85 (8.9%) PCPs provided 52% of all weight counseling and were categorized as 'positive deviant' (PD) physicians. Patients seeing PD physicians were older, less likely to be female and more likely to have hypertension, diabetes and obesity. Adjusting for patient characteristics strengthened the association between PD status and receipt of weight counseling during visits (adjusted odds ratio=13.2 (95% confidence interval 11.5-15.7)). In conclusion, a minority of PCPs provide the majority of primary-care weight counseling in the United States. Studies of these PCPs may help to identify practical methods to increase weight counseling in primary-care settings.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelPrimary Health CareAdultCross-Sectional StudiesDirective CounselingFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedObesityOdds RatioPatient Education as TopicPhysicians, Primary CarePractice Patterns, Physicians'United States

Identifiers

PMID22777541
PMCPMC4429525
OpenAlexW2016424513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.