Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22777316›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of clinical pharmacy2012

Difference of antihypertensive prescribing between office- and hospital-based clinics in Taiwan.

Wei-Liang Chen, Tung-Wei Kao, Chung-Ching Wang, Yaw-Wen Chang, Li-Wei Wu, Mark L Wahlqvist, Chih-Chieh Chou

Abstract readComparative StudyMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of clinical pharmacy, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Wei-Liang ChenDepartment of Family and Community Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Number 325, Section 2, Cheng-Gong Road, Neihu 114, Taipei, Taiwan.
Tung-Wei Kao
Chung-Ching Wang
Yaw-Wen Chang
Li-Wei Wu
Mark L Wahlqvist
Chih-Chieh Chou

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe geographical location and medical facility may affect the pattern of antihypertensive prescriptions. Information regarding the correlation between the prescription and health care faculties in different geographical locations was lacking.

objectiveThe aim of this study was to compare differences in the prescribing of antihypertensives between hospital-based clinics (hospital arm) and office-based clinics (office arm) in different geographical locations in Taiwan.

methodWe collected data from the National Health Insurance database of Taiwan to carry out a population-based, retrospective cohort analysis of 3,218,794 patients newly diagnosed with hypertension in the period January 1, 1997 to December 31, 2004. Eligible participants were classified into either of two groups based on the level of health care faculty: hospital arm and office arm. The covariates composed of age, gender, antihypertensive regimens, urbanization status, comorbidity, and Charlson comorbidity index.

resultsThere were 2,028,784 cases (63.0 %) for the hospital arm and 1,190,010 (37 %) for the office arm. In the hospital-based arm, there were 168,933 (8.3 %) patients diagnosed with diabetes mellitus, 166,110 (8.2 %) patients diagnosed with coronary artery disease, 147,465 (7.3 %) patients diagnosed with cerebrovascular accident, 86,866 (4.3 %) patients diagnosed with chronic kidney disease, 74,525 (3.7 %) patients diagnosed with benign prostatic hyperplasia, 55,517 (2.7 %) patients diagnosed with congestive heart failure. The all comorbidities in the hospital arm had significantly higher proportions than those in the office arm (p < 0.001). The Charlson comorbidity index in the hospital arm was higher than that in the office arm (p < 0.001). Physicians who practiced in the office arm prescribed polytherapy less often than those in the hospital arm (OR = 0.68, 95 % CI: 0.67-0.68). For overall urbanization status, the adjusted OR of polytherapy prescriptions in the aging city (OR = 1.08, 95 % CI: 1.05-1.12) was higher than other type cities. The highest urbanization-specific OR of polytherapy prescriptions was observed for highly urbanized city in the hospital arm (OR = 1.20, 95 % CI: 1.18-1.23) and aging city in the office arm (OR = 1.42, 95 % CI: 1.21-1.67). In the both arm, patients with lower CCI showed decreased risk of polytherapy prescription.

conclusionThe antihypertensive prescriptions in the clinical practices were different between the hospital arm and the office arm in the different health care, comorbidity, and urbanization status. During the study period, the proportion of antihypertensive polytherapy had declined.

Indexed as

Drug PrescriptionsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntihypertensive AgentsCohort StudiesFemaleHumansHypertensionMaleMiddle AgedNational Health ProgramsOutpatient Clinics, HospitalPhysicians' OfficesRetrospective StudiesTaiwanAntihypertensive Agents

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.