Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22777041›Full record

Trial reportAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2012

Safety and pharmacokinetics of the anti-orthopoxvirus compound ST-246 following a single daily oral dose for 14 days in human volunteers.

Jarasvech Chinsangaram, Kady M Honeychurch, Shanthakumar R Tyavanagimatt, Janet M Leeds, Tove' C Bolken, Kevin F Jones, Robert Jordan, Thomas Marbury, Jon Ruckle, Denis Mee-Lee and 7 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 52 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Oral Tecovirimat for the Treatment of Smallpox.The New England journal of medicine · 2018
    Trial
  2. A comprehensive overview of monkeypox virus disease.Tropical medicine and health · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Mpox: what sexual health physicians need to know?International journal of impotence research · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Monkeypox Virus Infections in Humans.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2022
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Management of patients with monkeypox virus infection and contacts in the community and in healthcare settings: a French position paper.Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases · 2022
    Review
  12. Antiviral Treatment against Monkeypox: A Scoping Review.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2022
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Therapeutic strategies to address monkeypox.Expert review of anti-infective therapy · 2022
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Drug Development against Smallpox: Present and Future.Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2020
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jarasvech ChinsangaramSIGA Technologies, Corvallis, Oregon, USA.
Kady M Honeychurch
Shanthakumar R Tyavanagimatt
Janet M Leeds
Tove' C Bolken
Kevin F Jones
Robert Jordan
Thomas Marbury
Jon Ruckle
Denis Mee-Lee
Eric Ross
Israel Lichtenstein
Margaret Pickens
Michael Corrado
Jean M Clarke
Annie M Frimm
Dennis E Hruby
Siga Technologies (United States) · USINC Research (United States) · USOrlando Clinical Research Center · US

Funding

NIAID NIH HHS HHSN266200600014CPHS HHS HHSN266200600014C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

ST-246 is being evaluated as a treatment for pathogenic orthopoxvirus infections in humans. To this end, a phase 2, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial was conducted to assess the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics (PK) of ST-246 when administered as a single daily oral dose (400 mg or 600 mg) for 14 days in fed adult volunteers. ST-246 was safe and well tolerated, with no deaths or serious adverse events reported during the study. There was a low incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), the most common of which were mild nausea and headache. There were no clinically significant results from laboratory assessments, vital sign measurements, physical examinations, or electrocardiograms. The PK and dose proportionality of ST-246 were determined. The PK analysis showed that steady state was achieved by day 5 for the ST-246 400-mg treatment group and by day 6 for the 600-mg group. The dose proportionality analysis showed that the 400- and 600-mg ratio of dose-normalized peak drug concentration in plasma (C(max)) and relative exposure for each dosing interval (AUC(τ)) ranged from 80% to 85%. However, the 90% confidence intervals did not include 1.0, so dose proportionality could not be concluded. Overall, ST-246 was shown to be safe, and the PK was predictable. These results support further testing of ST-246 in a multicenter pivotal clinical safety study for licensure application.

Indexed as

Administration, OralAdolescentAdultAgedAntiviral AgentsArea Under CurveBenzamidesBiological AvailabilityDouble-Blind MethodDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleHalf-LifeHumansIsoindolesMaleMiddle AgedAntiviral AgentsBenzamidesIsoindolesPhthalimidesPlacebostecovirimat

Identifiers

PMID22777041
PMCPMC3421894
OpenAlexW2022657624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.