Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22776627›Full record

Trial reportTrials2012

HElmet therapy Assessment in infants with Deformed Skulls (HEADS): protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Renske M van Wijk, Magda M Boere-Boonekamp, Catharina G M Groothuis-Oudshoorn, Leo A van Vlimmeren, Maarten J IJzerman

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Trials, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02370901 (Cranial Orthotic Device Versus Repositioning Techniques for the Management of Plagiocephaly), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02370901 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Cranial Orthotic Device Versus Repositioning Techniques for the Management of Plagiocephaly: the CRANIO Randomized Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorPat Ricalde,DDS, MD, FACSRan2017 to 2022Enrolled226ConditionsPlagiocephaly, NonsynostoticArmsHelmet, home therapies
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Parents' decision for helmet therapy in infants with skull deformation.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2014
    Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Renske M van WijkDepartment of Health Technology and Services Research, Institute for Governance Studies, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands. r.m.vanwijk@utwente.nl
Magda M Boere-Boonekamp
Catharina G M Groothuis-Oudshoorn
Leo A van Vlimmeren
Maarten J IJzerman

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn The Netherlands, helmet therapy is a commonly used treatment in infants with skull deformation (deformational plagiocephaly or deformational brachycephaly). However, evidence of the effectiveness of this treatment remains lacking. The HEADS study (HElmet therapy Assessment in Deformed Skulls) aims to determine the effects and costs of helmet therapy compared to no helmet therapy in infants with moderate to severe skull deformation. METHODS/

designPragmatic randomised controlled trial (RCT) nested in a cohort study. The cohort study included infants with a positional preference and/or skull deformation at two to four months (first assessment). At 5 months of age, all children were assessed again and infants meeting the criteria for helmet therapy were asked to participate in the RCT. Participants were randomly allocated to either helmet therapy or no helmet therapy. Parents of eligible infants that do not agree with enrolment in the RCT were invited to stay enrolled for follow up in a non-randomisedrandomised controlled trial (nRCT); they were then free to make the decision to start helmet therapy or not. Follow-up assessments took place at 8, 12 and 24 months of age. The main outcome will be head shape at 24 months that is measured using plagiocephalometry. Secondary outcomes will be satisfaction of parents and professionals with the appearance of the child, parental concerns about the future, anxiety level and satisfaction with the treatment, motor development and quality of life of the infant. Finally, compliance and costs will also be determined. DISCUSSION: HEADS will be the first study presenting data from an RCT on the effectiveness of helmet therapy. Outcomes will be important for affected children and their parents, health care professionals and future treatment policies. Our findings are likely to influence the reimbursement policies of health insurance companies.Besides these health outcomes, we will be able to address several methodological questions, e.g. do participants in an RCT represent the eligible target population and do outcomes of the RCT differ from outcomes found in the nRCT?

trial registrationISRCTN18473161.

Indexed as

Head Protective DevicesResearch DesignCephalometryChild DevelopmentCraniosynostosesHealth Care CostsHumansInfantMotor SkillsNetherlandsPatient CompliancePlagiocephaly, NonsynostoticQuality of LifeSeverity of Illness IndexSurveys and QuestionnairesTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID22776627
PMCPMC3475065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.