Trial reportTrials2012
Predictors of remission in depression to individual and combined treatments (PReDICT): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in Trials, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00360399 (Predictors of Antidepressant Treatment Response), which is not on this map. Cited by 72 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Predictors of Antidepressant Treatment Response: The Emory CIDAR
Who cites it
72 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 142 citations in OpenAlex.
- Co-alteration Network Architecture of Major Depressive Disorder: A Multi-modal Neuroimaging Assessment of Large-scale Disease Effects.Neuroinformatics · 2023Pooled it
- ERICH3: vesicular association and antidepressant treatment response.Molecular psychiatry · 2021Pooled it
- Psychotherapy or medication for depression? Using individual symptom meta-analyses to derive a Symptom-Oriented Therapy (SOrT) metric for a personalised psychiatry.BMC medicine · 2020Pooled it
- Psychological therapies for people with borderline personality disorder.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- The utility of measuring daily hassles and uplifts in understanding outcomes to treatments for major depressive disorder.Psychiatry research · 2024Trial
- Functional connectivity of salience and affective networks among remitted depressed patients predicts episode recurrence.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2023Trial
- Shared and Unique Changes in Brain Connectivity Among Depressed Patients After Remission With Pharmacotherapy Versus Psychotherapy.The American journal of psychiatry · 2023Trial
- Emotion-based brain mechanisms and predictors for SSRI and CBT treatment of anxiety and depression: a randomized trial.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2019Trial
- Benefits of Sequentially Adding Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy or Antidepressant Medication for Adults With Nonremitting Depression.The American journal of psychiatry · 2019Trial
- Antidepressant Outcomes Predicted by Genetic Variation in Corticotropin-Releasing Hormone Binding Protein.The American journal of psychiatry · 2018Trial
- Effects of Patient Preferences on Outcomes in the Predictors of Remission in Depression to Individual and Combined Treatments (PReDICT) Study.The American journal of psychiatry · 2017Trial
- Functional Connectivity of the Subcallosal Cingulate Cortex And Differential Outcomes to Treatment With Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy or Antidepressant Medication for Major Depressive Disorder.The American journal of psychiatry · 2017Trial
- Treating major depression with yoga: A prospective, randomized, controlled pilot trial.PloS one · 2017Trial
- Establishing moderators and biosignatures of antidepressant response in clinical care (EMBARC): Rationale and design.Journal of psychiatric research · 2016Trial
- Toward a neuroimaging treatment selection biomarker for major depressive disorder.JAMA psychiatry · 2013Trial
- Developing Clinically Interpretable Neuroimaging Biotypes in Psychiatry.Biological psychiatry · 2026Review
- Impact of Inflammation on White Matter Integrity and Functional Connectivity in Chronic Major Depressive Disorder.Biological psychiatry · 2026Article
- Prognostic Biomarkers and Precision Psychiatry: A Review of the Available Evidence.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Structural and functional covariance architecture of major depressive disorder: A meta-analytic structural equation modeling approach to primary neuroimaging analysis.Brain organoid & systems neuroscience journal · 2025Article
- Prediction of individual patient outcomes to psychotherapy vs medication for major depression.Npj mental health research · 2025Article
12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundLimited controlled data exist to guide treatment choices for clinicians caring for patients with major depressive disorder (MDD). Although many putative predictors of treatment response have been reported, most were identified through retrospective analyses of existing datasets and very few have been replicated in a manner that can impact clinical practice. One major confound in previous studies examining predictors of treatment response is the patient's treatment history, which may affect both the predictor of interest and treatment outcomes. Moreover, prior treatment history provides an important source of selection bias, thereby limiting generalizability. Consequently, we initiated a randomized clinical trial designed to identify factors that moderate response to three treatments for MDD among patients never treated previously for the condition. METHODS/
designTreatment-naïve adults aged 18 to 65 years with moderate-to-severe, non-psychotic MDD are randomized equally to one of three 12-week treatment arms: (1) cognitive behavior therapy (CBT, 16 sessions); (2) duloxetine (30-60 mg/d); or (3) escitalopram (10-20 mg/d). Prior to randomization, patients undergo multiple assessments, including resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), immune markers, DNA and gene expression products, and dexamethasone-corticotropin-releasing hormone (Dex/CRH) testing. Prior to or shortly after randomization, patients also complete a comprehensive personality assessment. Repeat assessment of the biological measures (fMRI, immune markers, and gene expression products) occurs at an early time-point in treatment, and upon completion of 12-week treatment, when a second Dex/CRH test is also conducted. Patients remitting by the end of this acute treatment phase are then eligible to enter a 21-month follow-up phase, with quarterly visits to monitor for recurrence. Non-remitters are offered augmentation treatment for a second 12-week course of treatment, during which they receive a combination of CBT and antidepressant medication. Predictors of the primary outcome, remission, will be identified for overall and treatment-specific effects, and a statistical model incorporating multiple predictors will be developed to predict outcomes. DISCUSSION: The PReDICT study's evaluation of biological, psychological, and clinical factors that may differentially impact treatment outcomes represents a sizeable step toward developing personalized treatments for MDD. Identified predictors should help guide the selection of initial treatments, and identify those patients most vulnerable to recurrence, who thus warrant maintenance or combination treatments to achieve and maintain wellness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.