ArticleStem cell research & therapy2012
Stem cells and regenerative medicine.
Article in Stem cell research & therapy, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical Progress in Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy: A Focus on Rheumatic Diseases.Immunity, inflammation and disease · 2025Review
- Podoplanin depletion in tonsil-derived mesenchymal stem cells induces cellular senescence via regulation of the p16Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2024Article
- Mesenchymal Stem Cells Derived from Human Periapical Cysts and Their Implications in Regenerative Medicine.Biomedicines · 2023Review
- Characterization of human induced pluripotent stems cells: Current approaches, challenges, and future solutions.Biotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2023Review
- Clinical application of mesenchymal stem cell in regenerative medicine: a narrative review.Stem cell research & therapy · 2022Review
- Three years of Stem Cell Research & Therapy.Stem cell research & therapy · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
The remarkable speed with which the field of stem cell biology has evolved is unprecedented and has already changed the way we do science. In this series of articles we have invited leading experts to present their efforts in moving from the bench to the bedside, with the hope that we can learn from the experiences of the pioneers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.