Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22776144›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2012

Clonal relatedness between lobular carcinoma in situ and synchronous malignant lesions.

Victor P Andrade, Irina Ostrovnaya, Venkatraman E Seshan, Mary Morrogh, Dilip Giri, Narciso Olvera, Marina De Brot, Monica Morrow, Colin B Begg, Tari A King

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Lobular carcinoma in situ: diagnostic criteria and molecular correlates.Modern pathology : an official journal of the United States and Canadian Academy of Pathology, Inc · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Lobular CarcinomasClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2019
    Article
  8. Lobular Carcinoma In Situ.Surgical pathology clinics · 2018
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Lobular Carcinoma in Situ: A 29-Year Longitudinal Experience Evaluating Clinicopathologic Features and Breast Cancer Risk.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2015
    Article
  13. Molecular drivers of lobular carcinoma in situ.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2015
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Victor P Andrade
Irina Ostrovnaya
Venkatraman E Seshan
Mary Morrogh
Dilip Giri
Narciso Olvera
Marina De Brot
Monica Morrow
Colin B Begg
Tari A King

Funding

Statistical Methods for Identifying Clonal TumorsR01CA124504 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI BEGG, COLIN B · 2009 to 2011
$1.1M
NCI NIH HHS CA124504
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionLobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) has been accepted as a marker of risk for the development of invasive breast cancer, yet modern models of breast carcinogenesis include LCIS as a precursor of low-grade carcinomas. We provide evidence favoring a clonal origin for LCIS and synchronous estrogen receptor-positive malignant lesions of the ductal and lobular phenotype.

methodsPatients with prior LCIS undergoing mastectomy were identified preoperatively from 2003 to 2008. Specimens were widely sampled, and frozen blocks were screened for LCIS and co-existing malignant lesions, and were subject to microdissection. Samples from 65 patients were hybridized to the Affymetrix SNP 6.0 array platform. Cases with both an LCIS sample and an associated ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) or invasive tumor sample were evaluated for patterns of somatic copy number changes to assess evidence of clonal relatedness.

resultsLCIS was identified in 44 of the cases, and among these a DCIS and/or invasive lesion was also identified in 21 cases. A total of 17 tumor pairs had adequate DNA/array data for analysis, including nine pairs of LCIS/invasive lobular cancer, four pairs of LCIS/DCIS, and four pairs of LCIS/invasive ductal cancer. Overall, seven pairs (41%) were judged to be clonally related; in five (29%) evidence suggested clonality but was equivocal, and five (29%) were considered independent. Clonal pairs were observed with all matched lesion types and low and high histological grades. We also show anecdotal evidence of clonality between a patient-matched triplet of LCIS, DCIS, and invasive ductal cancer.

conclusionOur results support the role of LCIS as a precursor in the development of both high-grade and low-grade ductal and lobular cancers.

Indexed as

Carcinoma in SituClonal EvolutionAllelesBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Ductal, BreastCarcinoma, LobularDNA Copy Number VariationsFemaleGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm InvasivenessBiomarkers, Tumor

Identifiers

PMID22776144
PMCPMC3680923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.