Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22776068›Full record

SynthesisEarly intervention in psychiatry2012

Predicting the risk of psychosis onset: advances and prospects.

Eric V Strobl, Shaun M Eack, Vaidy Swaminathan, Shyam Visweswaran

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Early intervention in psychiatry, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Eric V StroblMedical Scientist Training Program, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA. evs17@pitt.edu
Shaun M Eack
Vaidy Swaminathan
Shyam Visweswaran

Funding

TRAINING PROGRAM FOR MD/PHD STUDENTST32GM008208 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI STEINMAN, RICHARD A · 1987 to 2021
$15.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008208NLM NIH HHS HHSN276201000030C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo conduct a systematic review of the methods and performance characteristics of models developed for predicting the onset of psychosis.

methodsWe performed a comprehensive literature search restricted to English articles and identified using PubMed, Medline and PsychINFO, as well as the reference lists of published studies and reviews. Inclusion criteria included the selection of more than one variable to predict psychosis or schizophrenia onset, and selection of individuals at familial risk or clinical high risk. Eighteen studies met these criteria, and we compared these studies based on the subjects selected, predictor variables used and the choice of statistical or machine learning methods.

resultsQuality of life and life functioning as well as structural brain imaging emerged as the most promising predictors of psychosis onset, particularly when they were coupled with appropriate dimensionality reduction methods and predictive model algorithms like the support vector machine (SVM). Balanced accuracy ranged from 100% to 78% in four studies using the SVM, and 67% to 81% in 14 studies using general linear models.

conclusionsPerformance of the predictive models improves with quality of life measures, life functioning measures, structural brain imaging data, as well as with the use of methods like SVM. Despite these advances, the overall performance of psychosis predictive models is still modest. In the future, performance can potentially be improved by including genetic variant and new functional imaging data in addition to the predictors that are used currently.

Indexed as

Early DiagnosisHumansLinear ModelsPsychotic DisordersRisk FactorsSchizophreniaSupport Vector Machine

Identifiers

PMID22776068
PMCPMC3470783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.