Trial reportClinical drug investigation2012
Steady-state pharmacokinetics of gabapentin after administration of a novel gastroretentive extended-release formulation in postmenopausal women with vasomotor symptoms.
Trial report in Clinical drug investigation, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00511953 (A Phase 2, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled Study of the Pharmacokinetics), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Phase 2, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo Controlled Study of the Pharmacokinetics (PK) and Pharmacodynamics (PD) of Gabapentin Extended Release (G-ER) Tablets in the Treatment of Vasomotor Symptoms in Postmenopausal Women
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Rationale and design of a multicenter randomized clinical trial of extended release gabapentin in provoked vestibulodynia and biological correlates of response.Contemporary clinical trials · 2013Trial
- Optimization of gabapentin dosage in pediatric patients with renal impairment: a physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling approach.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- The Effect of Once-Daily Gabapentin Extended Release Formulation in Patients With Postamputation Pain.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2019Article
- Modified-Release Formulations of Second-Generation Antiepileptic Drugs: Pharmacokinetic and Clinical Aspects.CNS drugs · 2015Review
- Potential role of gabapentin and extended-release gabapentin in the management of menopausal hot flashes.International journal of general medicine · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveApproximately 75% of postmenopausal women experience vasomotor symptoms (hot flashes). Currently, hormone replacement therapy is the only approved treatment for hot flashes. However, its use has been associated with an increased risk of invasive breast cancer, coronary heart disease, stroke and venous thromboembolic disease. Gabapentin has also been demonstrated to be efficacious in the treatment of vasomotor symptoms in postmenopausal women when administered three times a day. A gastroretentive extended-release formulation of gabapentin (gabapentin-ER) has recently been demonstrated to be efficacious in the treatment of postmenopausal hot flashes. The objective of this paper is to report the steady-state pharmacokinetics and safety of gabapentin with different dosing regimens of gabapentin-ER in postmenopausal women with hot flashes.
methodsThis was a multicentre, randomized, double-blind, dose-escalating, placebo-controlled, parallel group study in 124 postmenopausal women experiencing ≥7 moderate to severe hot flashes per day. The study consisted of two 5-week treatment periods, with each one preceded by a 1-week titration to the assigned dose. Groups A, B and C received gabapentin-ER 600 mg evening (pm), 600 mg morning (am)/600 mg pm and 1200 mg pm in the first period, and then 600 mg am/1200 mg pm, 600 mg am/1800 mg pm and 1200 mg am/1800 mg pm in the second period, respectively. The tablets were taken after a non-specified meal. Pharmacokinetic sampling was conducted over a 24-hour period at the end of each study period. Plasma samples were analysed by a validated liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry method. Non-compartmental pharmacokinetic analysis was performed on the concentration-time data to determine area under the plasma concentration versus time curve from time zero to 24 hours (AUC(24)). Maximum (C(max)), minimum (C(min)) and average (C(avg)) drug concentration and time to reach C(max) (t(max)) were determined by inspection of the data. Tolerability was evaluated by physical examination, clinical laboratory measurements and adverse events monitoring.
resultsGabapentin exposure at steady state, as measured by AUC(24), increased with doses from 600 mg/day to 3000 mg/day, although there was a slight decrease in gabapentin's relative bioavailability with increasing dose compared with the 600 mg dose. The relative bioavailability compared with the 600 mg dose was 86-88% for the 1200 mg/day doses, 75% for the 1800 mg/day dose, 84% for the 2400 mg/day dose, and 73% for the 3000 mg/day dose. C(max) generally increased with increasing dose as did C(min) and C(avg) for the various treatments in a manner that was consistent with the dosing regimen. The values of t(max) were not different between the various doses, with the median t(max) values relative to the most recent dose ranging from 6 to 8 hours for all dose levels. Gabapentin-ER was generally well tolerated at all doses studied. The most common AEs were headache, dizziness and somnolence, with most being mild in intensity. Seven patients withdrew from the study due to AEs.
conclusionThe pharmacokinetic profile of gabapentin-ER may allow for once- or twice-daily dosing while maintaining bioavailability and thus efficacy. Gabapentin-ER was well tolerated. CLINICAL
trial registrationRegistered as ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00511953.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.