Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22774004›Full record

ArticleMolecular & cellular proteomics : MCP2012

A proteogenomic survey of the Medicago truncatula genome.

Jeremy D Volkening, Derek J Bailey, Christopher M Rose, Paul A Grimsrud, Maegen Howes-Podoll, Muthusubramanian Venkateshwaran, Michael S Westphall, Jean-Michel Ané, Joshua J Coon, Michael R Sussman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Proteogenomic analysis and global discovery of posttranslational modifications in prokaryotes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jeremy D VolkeningDepartment of Biochemistry, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin 53706, USA.
Derek J Bailey
Christopher M Rose
Paul A Grimsrud
Maegen Howes-Podoll
Muthusubramanian Venkateshwaran
Michael S Westphall
Jean-Michel Ané
Joshua J Coon
Michael R Sussman

Funding

Chemistry-Biology Interface Training ProgramT32GM008505 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI BLACKWELL, HELEN E. · 1993 to 2023
$9.8M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008505NIGMS NIH HHS T32GM008505
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Peptide sequencing by computational assignment of tandem mass spectra to a database of putative protein sequences provides an independent approach to confirming or refuting protein predictions based on large-scale DNA and RNA sequencing efforts. This use of mass spectrometrically-derived sequence data for testing and refining predicted gene models has been termed proteogenomics. We report herein the application of proteogenomic methodology to a database of 10.9 million tandem mass spectra collected over a period of two years from proteolytically generated peptides isolated from the model legume Medicago truncatula. These spectra were searched against a database of predicted M. truncatula protein sequences generated from public databases, in silico gene model predictions, and a whole-genome six-frame translation. This search identified 78,647 distinct peptide sequences, and a comparison with the publicly available proteome from the recently published M. truncatula genome supported translation of 9,843 existing gene models and identified 1,568 novel peptides suggesting corrections or additions to the current annotations. Each supporting and novel peptide was independently validated using mRNA-derived deep sequencing coverage and an overall correlation of 93% between the two data types was observed. We have additionally highlighted examples of several aspects of structural annotation for which tandem MS provides unique evidence not easily obtainable through typical DNA or RNA sequencing. Proteogenomic analysis is a valuable and unique source of information for the structural annotation of genomes and should be included in such efforts to ensure that the genome models used by biologists mirror as accurately as possible what is present in the cell.

Indexed as

Genome, PlantProteomicsAlgorithmsAmino Acid SequenceDatabases, ProteinInformation DisseminationMass SpectrometryMedicago truncatulaMolecular Sequence DataPeptidesPlant ProteinsProteomeSequence Analysis, DNAPeptidesPlant ProteinsProteome

Identifiers

PMID22774004
PMCPMC3494139

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.