Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22773951›Full record

ReviewOpen biology2012

Experimental approaches for addressing fundamental biological questions in living, functioning cells with single molecule precision.

Tchern Lenn, Mark C Leake

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Open biology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Imaging the cell.Biophysical reviews · 2017
    Article
  16. Review
  17. The physics of life: one molecule at a time.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2013
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tchern LennLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Physical Biosciences Division, 1 Cyclotron Road, Berkeley, CA 94720 , USA.
Mark C Leake

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, single molecule experimentation has allowed researchers to observe biological processes at the sensitivity level of single molecules in actual functioning, living cells, thereby allowing us to observe the molecular basis of the key mechanistic processes in question in a very direct way, rather than inferring these from ensemble average data gained from traditional molecular and biochemical techniques. In this short review, we demonstrate the impact that the application of single molecule bioscience experimentation has had on our understanding of various cellular systems and processes, and the potential that this approach has for the future to really address very challenging and fundamental questions in the life sciences.

Indexed as

AnimalsCHO CellsCricetinaeCricetulusEscherichia coliFluorescent DyesHumansMicroscopy, Fluorescence, MultiphotonFluorescent Dyesfluorescence imagingfluorescent proteinin vivomicroscopysingle moleculesuper-resolution

Identifiers

PMID22773951
PMCPMC3390795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.