ArticleJournal of the mechanics and physics of solids2012
Computational Optogenetics: A Novel Continuum Framework for the Photoelectrochemistry of Living Systems.
Article in Journal of the mechanics and physics of solids, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.
- Optogenetically engineered Ca2+ oscillation-mediated DRP1 activation promotes mitochondrial fission and cell death.Journal of cell science · 2023Article
- Cardiac optogenetics: a decade of enlightenment.Nature reviews. Cardiology · 2021Review
- Implantable Neural Probes for Brain-Machine Interfaces - Current Developments and Future Prospects.Experimental neurobiology · 2018Review
- Predicting the cardiac toxicity of drugs using a novel multiscale exposure-response simulator.Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering · 2018Article
- Minimal time spiking in various ChR2-controlled neuron models.Journal of mathematical biology · 2018Article
- Light-based Approaches to Cardiac Arrhythmia Research: From Basic Science to Translational Applications.Clinical Medicine Insights. Cardiology · 2016Review
- Computational modeling of cardiac optogenetics: Methodology overview & review of findings from simulations.Computers in biology and medicine · 2015Review
- Optogenetic versus Electrical Stimulation of Human Cardiomyocytes: Modeling Insights.Biophysical journal · 2015Article
- Optical mapping of optogenetically shaped cardiac action potentials.Scientific reports · 2014Article
- Toward microendoscopy-inspired cardiac optogenetics in vivo: technical overview and perspective.Journal of biomedical optics · 2014Review
- Cardiac applications of optogenetics.Progress in biophysics and molecular biology · 2014Review
- Multi-scale multi-mechanism design of tough hydrogels: building dissipation into stretchy networks.Soft matter · 2014Review
- Computational modelling of electrocardiograms: repolarisation and T-wave polarity in the human heart.Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering · 2014Article
- Generating fibre orientation maps in human heart models using Poisson interpolation.Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering · 2014Article
- Computational modeling of chemo-electro-mechanical coupling: a novel implicit monolithic finite element approach.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2013Article
- Computational optogenetics: empirically-derived voltage- and light-sensitive channelrhodopsin-2 model.PLoS computational biology · 2013Article
- Advances in modeling ventricular arrhythmias: from mechanisms to the clinic.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicineReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Electrical stimulation is currently the gold standard treatment for heart rhythm disorders. However, electrical pacing is associated with technical limitations and unavoidable potential complications. Recent developments now enable the stimulation of mammalian cells with light using a novel technology known as optogenetics. The optical stimulation of genetically engineered cells has significantly changed our understanding of electrically excitable tissues, paving the way towards controlling heart rhythm disorders by means of photostimulation. Controlling these disorders, in turn, restores coordinated force generation to avoid sudden cardiac death. Here, we report a novel continuum framework for the photoelectrochemistry of living systems that allows us to decipher the mechanisms by which this technology regulates the electrical and mechanical function of the heart. Using a modular multiscale approach, we introduce a non-selective cation channel, channelrhodopsin-2, into a conventional cardiac muscle cell model via an additional photocurrent governed by a light-sensitive gating variable. Upon optical stimulation, this channel opens and allows sodium ions to enter the cell, inducing electrical activation. In side-by-side comparisons with conventional heart muscle cells, we show that photostimulation directly increases the sodium concentration, which indirectly decreases the potassium concentration in the cell, while all other characteristics of the cell remain virtually unchanged. We integrate our model cells into a continuum model for excitable tissue using a nonlinear parabolic second order partial differential equation, which we discretize in time using finite differences and in space using finite elements. To illustrate the potential of this computational model, we virtually inject our photosensitive cells into different locations of a human heart, and explore its activation sequences upon photostimulation. Our computational optogenetics tool box allows us to virtually probe landscapes of process parameters, and to identify optimal photostimulation sequences with the goal to pace human hearts with light and, ultimately, to restore mechanical function.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.