Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22773737›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical genetics2012

Targeted high-throughput sequencing for diagnosis of genetically heterogeneous diseases: efficient mutation detection in Bardet-Biedl and Alström syndromes.

Claire Redin, Stéphanie Le Gras, Oussema Mhamdi, Véronique Geoffroy, Corinne Stoetzel, Marie-Claire Vincent, Pietro Chiurazzi, Didier Lacombe, Ines Ouertani, Florence Petit and 7 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical genetics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 113 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. WGS Revealed NovelInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Atypical phenotype of a patient with Bardet-Biedl syndrome type 4.Molecular genetics & genomic medicine · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 10 institutions in 3 countries.

Claire RedinInstitut de Génétique et de Biologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire (IGBMC), CNRS UMR7104, INSERM U964, Université de Strasbourg, Illkirch, France.
Stéphanie Le Gras
Oussema Mhamdi
Véronique Geoffroy
Corinne Stoetzel
Marie-Claire Vincent
Pietro Chiurazzi
Didier Lacombe
Ines Ouertani
Florence Petit
Marianne Till
Alain Verloes
Bernard Jost
Habiba Bouhamed Chaabouni
Helene Dollfus
Jean-Louis Mandel
Jean Muller
Institut de génétique et de biologie moléculaire et cellulaire · FRTunis University · TNInserm · FRUniversité de Strasbourg · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille · FRHôpital Robert-Debré · FRHôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg · FRHospices Civils de Lyon · FRUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITUniversité de Bordeaux · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBardet-Biedl syndrome (BBS) is a pleiotropic recessive disorder that belongs to the rapidly growing family of ciliopathies. It shares phenotypic traits with other ciliopathies, such as Alström syndrome (ALMS), nephronophthisis (NPHP) or Joubert syndrome. BBS mutations have been detected in 16 different genes (BBS1-BBS16) without clear genotype-to-phenotype correlation. This extensive genetic heterogeneity is a major concern for molecular diagnosis and genetic counselling. While various strategies have been recently proposed to optimise mutation detection, they either fail to detect mutations in a majority of patients or are time consuming and costly.

methodWe tested a targeted exon-capture strategy coupled with multiplexing and high-throughput sequencing on 52 patients: 14 with known mutations as proof-of-principle and 38 with no previously detected mutation. Thirty genes were targeted in total including the 16 BBS genes, the 12 known NPHP genes, the single ALMS gene ALMS1 and the proposed modifier CCDC28B.

resultsThis strategy allowed the reliable detection of causative mutations (including homozygous/heterozygous exon deletions) in 68% of BBS patients without previous molecular diagnosis and in all proof-of-principle samples. Three probands carried homozygous truncating mutations in ALMS1 confirming the major phenotypic overlap between both disorders. The efficiency of detecting mutations in patients was positively correlated with their compliance with the classical BBS phenotype (mutations were identified in 81% of 'classical' BBS patients) suggesting that only a few true BBS genes remain to be identified. We illustrate some interpretation problems encountered due to the multiplicity of identified variants.

conclusionThis strategy is highly efficient and cost effective for diseases with high genetic heterogeneity, and guarantees a quality of coverage in coding sequences of target genes suited for diagnosis purposes.

Indexed as

Sequence DeletionAlstrom SyndromeBardet-Biedl SyndromeCell Cycle ProteinsCohort StudiesCytoskeletal ProteinsDNA Mutational AnalysisExonsGenetic Association StudiesGenetic Diseases, InbornGenetic HeterogeneityGenetic TestingGenome, HumanHeterozygoteHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHomozygoteALMS1 protein, humanCCDC28B protein, humanCell Cycle ProteinsCytoskeletal ProteinsProteins

Identifiers

PMID22773737
PMCPMC3436454
OpenAlexW2170440371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.