Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22773188›Full record

ReviewInternal and emergency medicine2013

Muscle atrophy in aging and chronic diseases: is it sarcopenia or cachexia?

Maurizio Muscaritoli, Simone Lucia, Alessio Molfino, Tommy Cederholm, Filippo Rossi Fanelli

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Internal and emergency medicine, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Sarcopenia: A Time for Action. An SCWD Position Paper.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2019
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Collagen-induced arthritis as an animal model of rheumatoid cachexia.Journal of cachexia, sarcopenia and muscle · 2018
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Maurizio MuscaritoliDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Sapienza, University of Rome, Viale dell'Università, 37, 00185, Rome, Italy, maurizio.muscaritoli@uniroma1.it.
Simone Lucia
Alessio Molfino
Tommy Cederholm
Filippo Rossi Fanelli

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cachexia and sarcopenia present several analogies in both the pathogenic mechanisms and the clinical picture. The loss of muscle mass and strength is a hallmark of these two clinical conditions. Although frequently overlapping and often indistinguishable, especially in old individuals, these two conditions should be considered distinct clinical entities. A prompt and accurate patient evaluation, guiding the physician through a proper differential diagnostic procedure and providing the best therapeutic options, is recommended. Given the several commonalities between cachexia and sarcopenia, it is likely that the therapeutic approaches may prove effective in both conditions. This review focuses on the most recent available literature and aims at providing physicians with the correct tools that are available to aid in diagnosing these two different entities that often clinically overlap. Currently available or proposed therapeutic strategies for pre-cachexia, cachexia and sarcopenia are also briefly described.

Indexed as

AgingCachexiaChronic DiseaseHumansMuscular AtrophySarcopenia

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.