ArticleJournal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics2012
From in vitro EC₅₀ to in vivo dose-response for antiretrovirals using an HIV disease model. Part II: application to drug development.
Article in Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Characterizing Class-Specific Exposure-Viral Load Suppression Response of HIV Antiretrovirals Using A Model-Based Meta-Analysis.Clinical and translational science · 2016Pooled it
- Efficacy of the early administration of valacyclovir hydrochloride for the treatment of neuropathogenic equine herpesvirus type-1 infection in horses.American journal of veterinary research · 2017Trial
- Exploiting Pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic Methods for Optimizing and Accelerating Drug Development of Innovative Anti-Infectives.ChemMedChem · 2026Review
- Integrated Population Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic Modeling of HIV Virus-host Infection Dynamics in Patients Undergoing Antiretroviral Monotherapy.The AAPS journal · 2025Article
- Model based design and analysis of phase II HIV-1 trials.Journal of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The purpose of this research was to qualify a previously derived quantitative model-based framework that proposed an in vitro-in vivo linkage to predict the dose-response relationship of an antiretroviral (ARV) new molecular entity (NME) in a monotherapy trial. Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1 ribonucleic acid (RNA) data from monotherapy trials in ARV naïve/experienced HIV-infected subjects for eight drugs (i.e. application case, a representative drug for a given class used for external validation) across four distinct classes of ARV agents (co-receptor antagonists; non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors; nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors; and integrase strand transfer inhibitors) were obtained. Using the in vitro EC₅₀ (protein binding corrected) and a class-specific scaling factor (SF), the in vivo IC₅₀ was calculated for each drug. The integrated pharmacokinetic (PK)-pharmacodynamic (PD) disease model used the predicted in vivo IC₅₀ to simulate the HIV-1 RNA-time profiles for dosing regimens that were studied in the monotherapy trials for each drug. The simulated HIV-1 RNA time profiles were then compared to the observed data. The simulated HIV-1 RNA-time profiles matched well with those observed in the monotherapy trials except for one drug in the INSTIs class. The derived SF represents a useful in vitro-in vivo linkage to predict the dose-response relationship for a NME using in vitro data. The mechanistic PK-PD disease model-based framework is useful to assist the dose selection for monotherapy trials and comparator modeling approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
22773164What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.