Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22772889›Full record

ArticleZeitschrift fur Rheumatologie2012

[Magnetic resonance angiography in rheumatology].

T A Bley, B Ostendorf, A Scherer, H Kellner, W A Schmidt

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. [Polymyalgia rheumatica].Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2013
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

T A BleyKlinik und Poliklinik für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Hamburg - Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Deutschland. t.bley@uke.de
B Ostendorf
A Scherer
H Kellner
W A Schmidt
Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf · DEImmanuel Krankenhaus · DEKlinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The potentials and pitfalls of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) in the diagnosis of large vessel vasculitis are summarized in this review article. With the ability to visualize the lumen and vessel walls of large and medium sized arteries, MRI and MRA have great potential to play a unique role in the diagnosis of large vessel vasculitis. This is underlined by the fact that mural inflammatory changes typically involve uptake of contrast agent that can be visualized with MRI. The cranial, intracranial and extracranial involvement pattern can be studied in a combined approach including an MRI examination of the superficial cranial arteries and an MRA examination of the thoracic aorta with its major supra-aortic branches. Typical MRI sequence parameters are given including monophasic MRA and time-resolved MRA protocols at 3 T. The MRI and MRA techniques have the potential to determine the most suitable (inflamed) segment for temporal artery biopsy and to monitor treatment. Initial results of multicenter studies for the diagnostic accuracy of these relatively new methods are expected soon. The MRA technique is recognized as an interesting alternative to invasive catheter angiography for the evaluation of central nervous system (CNS) vasculitis.

Indexed as

HumansImage EnhancementMagnetic Resonance AngiographyVasculitis

Identifiers

PMID22772889
OpenAlexW2170377141

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.