Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22772714›Full record

ArticleBiomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology2012

The contribution of cellular mechanotransduction to cardiomyocyte form and function.

Sean P Sheehy, Anna Grosberg, Kevin Kit Parker

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Exploring cardiac form and function: A length-scale computational biology approach.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Bioreactor Platform for Biomimetic Culture andFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020
    Article
  19. A tissue-engineered scale model of the heart ventricle.Nature biomedical engineering · 2018
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sean P SheehyDisease Biophysics Group, Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering, School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Pierce Hall Rm. 321, 29 Oxford St., Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
Anna Grosberg
Kevin Kit Parker
Harvard University · US

Funding

Human Pluripotent Stem Cell and Progenitor Models of Cardiac and Blood DiseasesU01HL100408 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI COWAN, CHAD ALBERT, MELTON, DOUGLAS A · 2009 to 2015
$8.9M
Heart-Lung Micromachine for Safety and Efficacy TestingU01NS073474 · NINDS · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI INGBER, DONALD E · 2010 to 2012
$3.2M
Myocyte Shape in Myofibril Patterning and ContractionR01HL079126 · NHLBI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI PARKER, KEVIN KIT · 2007 to 2010
$1.4M
NHLBI NIH HHS 1 R01 HL079126NHLBI NIH HHS 1 U01 HL100408-02NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL079126NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL100408NINDS NIH HHS 1 U01 NS073474-01NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS073474
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Myocardial development is regulated by an elegantly choreographed ensemble of signaling events mediated by a multitude of intermediates that take a variety of forms. Cellular differentiation and maturation are a subset of vertically integrated processes that extend over several spatial and temporal scales to create a well-defined collective of cells that are able to function cooperatively and reliably at the organ level. Early efforts to understand the molecular mechanisms of cardiomyocyte fate determination focused primarily on genetic and chemical mediators of this process. However, increasing evidence suggests that mechanical interactions between the extracellular matrix (ECM) and cell surface receptors as well as physical interactions between neighboring cells play important roles in regulating the signaling pathways controlling the developmental processes of the heart. Interdisciplinary efforts have made it apparent that the influence of the ECM on cellular behavior occurs through a multitude of physical mechanisms, such as ECM boundary conditions, elasticity, and the propagation of mechanical signals to intracellular compartments, such as the nucleus. In addition to experimental studies, a number of mathematical models have been developed that attempt to capture the interplay between cells and their local microenvironment and the influence these interactions have on cellular self-assembly and functional behavior. Nevertheless, many questions remain unanswered concerning the mechanism through which physical interactions between cardiomyocytes and their environment are translated into biochemical cellular responses and how these signaling modalities can be utilized in vitro to fabricate myocardial tissue constructs from stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes that more faithfully represent their in vivo counterpart. These studies represent a broad effort to characterize biological form as a conduit for information transfer that spans the nanometer length scale of proteins to the meter length scale of the patient and may yield new insights into the contribution of mechanotransduction into heart development and disease.

Indexed as

Models, CardiovascularAnimalsCells, CulturedComputer SimulationElastic ModulusHeart Conduction SystemHumansMyocardial ContractionMyocytes, Cardiac

Identifiers

PMID22772714
PMCPMC3786397
OpenAlexW2155820918

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.