Trial reportDer Urologe. Ausg. A2012
[Colovesical fistula caused by diverticulitis of the sigmoid colon: diagnosis and treatment].
Trial report in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Colovesical fistula following sigmoid resection: A complex postoperative complication assessed by multimodal imaging.Radiology case reports · 2026Article
- Emphysematous cystitis as a potential marker of severe Crohn's disease.BMC gastroenterology · 2022Article
- Appendico-vesicocolonic fistula: A case report and review of literature.World journal of clinical cases · 2022Article
- [Colovesical fistulas : An interdisciplinary challenge].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2017Article
- Laparoscopic surgery of benign entero-vesical or entero-vaginal fistulae.International journal of colorectal disease · 2016Article
- Outcome of colonic fistula surgery in the modern surgical era.Techniques in coloproctology · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundColovesical fistulas caused by diverticulitis of the sigmoid colon are a rare but complex disease for which there is so far no diagnostic and therapeutic algorithm. The goal of this retrospective study including long-term follow-up was to find an algorithm for the diagnosis and therapy of colovesical fistulas caused by diverticular disease.
methodsBetween 1982 and 2010 a total of 54 patients (46 male and 8 female) were treated in this institute for a colovesical fistula caused by diverticulitis of the sigmoid colon. The validity of the following diagnostic procedures was considered: poppy seed test, abdominal computed tomography (CT), cystoscopy, coloscopy, cystography and colon enema. The one stage operation included resection of the inflamed colon and a two-lined hand sewn end to end anastomosis of the colon without protective colostomy. After excision of the fistula a two-lined closure of the bladder defect was carried out followed by insertion of a catheter for 7 days. During follow-up patients were examined for recurrence of diverticulitis and colovesical fistula.
resultsAt primary clinical presentation all patients showed clinical symptoms of recurrent urinary tract infections, 74.1% had pneumaturia and 53.7% fecaluria. Fistula detection rates were 94.8% for the poppy seed test, 58.7% for CT scanning, 19.4% for cystography, 38.6% for colon enema, 15.1% for cystoscopy and 9.6% for coloscopy. Of the patients 6 (11.1%) showed perioperative morbidity (3 pneumonia and 3 superficial wound infections) and mortality was 0%. After surgical intervention no recurring diverticulitis or fistulas were detected within a median follow-up period of 62 months (range 1-164 months).
conclusionsThe poppy seed test is the most reliable diagnostic method for the detection of colovesical fistulas. The one-stage resection of the fistula of the colon and bladder segment without protective colostomy is safe and feasible.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.