Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22772436›Full record

ArticleMammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society2012

Construction and phenotypic analysis of mice carrying a duplication of the major histocompatibility class I (MHC-I) locus.

Olga Ermakova, Ekaterina Salimova, Lukasz Piszczek, Cornelius Gross

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. TheCells · 2024
    Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Olga ErmakovaMouse Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, Monterotondo, Italy. olga.ermakova@emma.cnr.it
Ekaterina Salimova
Lukasz Piszczek
Cornelius Gross

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Copy number variation (CNV) has been associated increasingly with altered susceptibility to human disease. Large CNVs are likely to incur disease risk or resilience via predictable changes in gene dosage that are relatively straightforward to model using chromosomal engineering in mice. The classical class I major histocompatibility locus (MHC-I) contains a dense set of genes essential for innate immune system function in vertebrates. MHC-I genes are highly polymorphic and genetic variation in the region is associated with altered susceptibility to a wide variety of common diseases. Here we investigated the role of gene dosage within MHC-I on susceptibility to disease by engineering a mouse line carrying a 1.9-Mb duplication of this region [called Dp(MHC-I)]. Extensive phenotypic analysis of heterozygous (3N) Dp(MHC-I) animals did not reveal altered blood and stem cell parameters, susceptibility to high-fat diet, death by cancer, or contact dermatitis. However, several measures of disease severity in a model of atherosclerosis were improved, suggesting dosage-sensitive modulators of cardiovascular disease. Homozygous Dp(MHC-I)/Dp(MHC-I) mice demonstrated embryonic lethality. These mice serve as a model for studying the consequences of targeted gene dosage alteration in MHC-I with functional and evolutionary implications.

Indexed as

Gene DuplicationGenes, MHC Class IAdenomaAnimalsAtherosclerosisBlood GlucoseCarotid ArteriesCholesterolComparative Genomic HybridizationDermatitis, ContactDiet, High-FatDNA Copy Number VariationsEar, ExternalFemaleGenetic EngineeringHematopoietic Stem CellsBlood GlucoseCholesterolOctamer Transcription Factor-3Pou5f1 protein, mouse

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.