Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22771703›Full record

ReviewBrain research2012

Bursts modify electrical synaptic strength.

Julie S Haas, Carole E Landisman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain research, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Rapid synaptic and gamma rhythm signature of mouse critical period plasticity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Julie S HaasCenter for Brain Science, Harvard University, 52 Oxford St. NWL 202, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA. julie.haas@gmail.com
Carole E Landisman
Harvard University · US

Funding

Activity-dependent modification of electrical synapse strengthR03NS075722 · NINDS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI HENSCH, TAKAO K · 2012 to 2013
$166k
NINDS NIH HHS R03 NS075722
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Changes in synaptic strength resulting from neuronal activity have been described in great detail for chemical synapses, but the relationship between natural forms of activity and the strength of electrical synapses had previously not been investigated. The thalamic reticular nucleus (TRN), a brain area rich in gap junctional (electrical) synapses, regulates cortical attention, initiates sleep spindles, and participates in shifts between states of arousal. Plasticity of electrical synapses in the TRN may be a key mechanism underlying these processes. Recently, we demonstrated a novel activity-dependent form of long-term depression of electrical synapses in the TRN (Haas et al., 2011). Here we provide an overview of those findings and discuss them in broader context. Because gap junctional proteins are widely expressed in the mammalian brain, modification of synaptic strength is likely to be a widespread and powerful mechanism at electrical synapses throughout the brain.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsBrainCalcium SignalingConnexinsElectrical SynapsesElectrophysiological PhenomenaGap Junction delta-2 ProteinGap JunctionsHumansNeuronal PlasticitySodiumThalamic NucleiConnexinsGap Junction delta-2 ProteinSodium

Identifiers

PMID22771703
PMCPMC3501583
OpenAlexW2019842952

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.