Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22771577›Full record

Trial reportContemporary clinical trials2012

Questions about quitting (Q2): design and methods of a Multiphase Optimization Strategy (MOST) randomized screening experiment for an online, motivational smoking cessation intervention.

J B McClure, H Derry, K R Riggs, E W Westbrook, J St John, S M Shortreed, A Bogart, L C An

Erratum issued 2 registry-linked trialsAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Contemporary clinical trials, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00992264 nacompletednot on this map

Optimizing an Online Motivational Tobacco Cessation Program

TypeinterventionalSponsorKaiser PermanenteRan2010 to 2013Enrolled1,865ConditionsSmokingArmsMessage Tone, Navigation, Proactive Outreach, Testimonials
NCT03243396 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Building and Sustaining Interventions for Children (BASIC): Task-sharing Mental Health Care in Low-resource Settings

TypeinterventionalSponsorDuke UniversityRan2018 to 2024Enrolled956ConditionsGrief, Post Traumatic Stress Disorder, DepressionArmsTrauma-Focused Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Internet-based interventions for smoking cessation.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Exploring the "active ingredients" of an online smoking intervention: a randomized factorial trial.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2014
    Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

J B McClureGroup Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA 98101, USA. mcclure.j@ghc.org
H Derry
K R Riggs
E W Westbrook
J St John
S M Shortreed
A Bogart
L C An

Funding

Optimizing an online motivational tobacco cessation programR01CA138598 · NCI · KAISER FOUNDATION HEALTH PLAN OF WASHINGTON · PI MCCLURE, JENNIFER B · 2009 to 2012
$2.3M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA138598
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Effective interventions are needed to improve smokers' motivation for quitting, treatment utilization, and abstinence rates. The Internet provides an ideal modality for delivering such interventions, given the low cost, broad reach, and capacity to individually tailor content, but important methodological questions remain about how to best design and deliver an online, motivational intervention to smokers. The current paper reports on the intervention, study design and research methods of a randomized trial (called Questions about Quitting) designed to address some of these questions. Using a Multi-phase Optimization Strategy (MOST) screening experiment, the trial has two key aims: to examine the impact of four experimental intervention factors (each evaluated on two levels) on smokers' subsequent treatment utilization and abstinence, and to examine select moderators of each sub-factor's effectiveness. The experimental factors of interest are: navigation autonomy (content viewing order is dictated based on stage of change or not), use of self-efficacy based testimonials (yes vs. no), proactive outreach (reminder emails vs. no emails), and decisional framework (prescriptive vs. motivational tone). To our knowledge, this is the first application of the MOST methodology to explore these factors or to explore the optimal design for a motivational intervention targeting smokers not actively trying to quit smoking. The rationale for the experimental factor choice, intervention design, and trial methods are discussed. Outcome data are currently being collected and are not presented, but recruitment data confirm the feasibility of enrolling smokers at varying stages of readiness to quit.

Indexed as

InternetAdolescentAdultCognitive Behavioral TherapyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotivationRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSelf EfficacySmoking CessationSocioeconomic FactorsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID22771577
PMCPMC3408878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.