Evidence map›Paper›PMID 22771575›Full record

ArticleContemporary clinical trials2012

Attributes of researchers and their strategies to recruit minority populations: results of a national survey.

Sandra Crouse Quinn, James Butler, Craig S Fryer, Mary A Garza, Kevin H Kim, Christopher Ryan, Stephen B Thomas

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary clinical trials, 2012. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Responding to Sexual Abuse in Health Care: Development of a Guide for Patients.Journal of patient-centered research and reviews · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Enrolling Family Participants in a Statewide Implementation Trial of an Evidence-Based Treatment.Progress in community health partnerships : research, education, and action · 2017
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Building a "Deep Fund of Good Will": Reframing Research Engagement.Journal of health care for the poor and underserved · 2016
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sandra Crouse QuinnUniversity of Maryland, School of Public Health, Maryland Center for Health Equity and Department of Family Science, College Park, MD 20742, USA. scquinn@umd.edu
James Butler
Craig S Fryer
Mary A Garza
Kevin H Kim
Christopher Ryan
Stephen B Thomas
University of Maryland, College Park · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Uncovering and Addressing Cultural Beliefs Behind Vaccine Racial Disparities P20MD006737 · NIMHD · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI QUINN, SANDRA CROUSE, THOMAS, STEPHEN B. · 2012 to 2016
$5.9M
Building Trust Between Minorities and ResearchersRC2MD004766 · NIMHD · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI QUINN, SANDRA CROUSE, THOMAS, STEPHEN B. · 2009 to 2010
$4.0M
Smoking Cessation among Residents of Public HousingK01CA134939 · NCI · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI BUTLER III, JAMES · 2009 to 2013
$652k
Correlates of Nicotine Dependence among Urban African American YouthK01CA148789 · NCI · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI FRYER, CRAIG S. · 2010 to 2014
$633k
African Americans and Colorectal Cancer: A Multilevel Model to Assess Factors forK01CA140358 · NCI · UNIV OF MARYLAND, COLLEGE PARK · PI GARZA, MARY A · 2010 to 2012
$392k
NCI NIH HHS K01 CA134939NCI NIH HHS K01CA134939NCI NIH HHS K01 CA140358NCI NIH HHS K01CA140358NCI NIH HHS K01 CA148789NCI NIH HHS K01CA148789NIMHD NIH HHS P20 MD006737NIMHD NIH HHS RC2 MD004766NIMHD NIH HHS RC2MD004766
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite NIH mandates for inclusion, recruiting minorities is challenging for biomedical and public health researchers. Little is known about how attributes of researchers affect their choice of recruitment strategies. The purpose of this study was to address this gap by examining how use of recruitment strategies relates to other researcher characteristics. To do this, we conducted an online survey from May to August 2010 with researchers (principal investigators, research staff, and IRB members) in which we measured the number and types of recruitment strategies utilized, along with other characteristics of the researchers and their research. We identified two clusters of researchers: comprehensive researchers who utilized a greater number and more diverse and active recruitment strategies, and traditional researchers, who utilized fewer and more passive strategies. Additional characteristics that distinguished the two groups were that comprehensive researchers were more likely than traditional researchers to 1) report racial and ethnic differences as one of their specific aims or hypotheses, 2) receive federal (CDC and NIH) funding, 3) conduct behavioral or epidemiological research, and 4) have received training in conducting research with and recruiting minorities. Traditional researchers, on the other hand, were more likely to conduct clinical research and a greater (though non-significant) percentage received funding from pharmaceutical sources. This study provides a novel description of how researcher attributes are related to their recruitment strategies and raises a number of future research questions to further examine the implications of this relationship.

Indexed as

Patient SelectionAdultFemaleFinancing, GovernmentHumansMaleMiddle AgedMinority GroupsResearch DesignResearch Personnel

Identifiers

PMID22771575
PMCPMC3468713
OpenAlexW2025243969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.